CAJ | 학술논문

目的对比分析我院消毒供应室对回收的复用器械两种手工清洗方法，并对清洗质量进行检测对比。方法传统组采用医用纯碱清洗、0.5%84溶液浸泡消毒、石蜡油上光，改进组应用规范的手工清洗程序加规范使用酶洗液、除锈剂、防锈润滑剂，清洗后对两组进行目测、放大镜检测和隐血测试。结果检测结果显示，改进组的清洗质量明显优于传统组，改进组清洗后器械的洁净度为99%，隐血测试阳性率仅为3.66%，而传统组清洗后器械的洁净度为86.33%，隐血测试阳性率达45.33%，两组比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论规范手工清洗加规范使用酶洗液、除锈剂、防锈润滑剂的清洗方法是基层医院最为理想的清洗方法。
목적대비분석아원소독공응실대회수적복용기계량충수공청세방법，병대청세질량진행검측대비。방법전통조채용의용순감청세、0.5%84용액침포소독、석사유상광，개진조응용규범적수공청세정서가규범사용매세액、제수제、방수윤활제，청세후대량조진행목측、방대경검측화은혈측시。결과검측결과현시，개진조적청세질량명현우우전통조，개진조청세후기계적길정도위99%，은혈측시양성솔부위3.66%，이전통조청세후기계적길정도위86.33%，은혈측시양성솔체45.33%，량조비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론규범수공청세가규범사용매세액、제수제、방수윤활제적청세방법시기층의원최위이상적청세방법。
The purpose of comparative analysis of our hospital sterile supply room on the recovery of the multiplexer mechanical two manual cleaning methods, and cleaning quality detection contrast. Medical soda ash cleaning methods traditional group, 0.5% 84 solution immersion disinfection, paraffin oil glazing, improved set of application-specific hand-washing procedures and regulate the use of the enzyme lotion, rust remover, rust lubricant, cleaning of the two groups Visually, the magnifying glass to detect occult blood test. The test results showed that the cleaning quality improvement group was significantly better than the traditional group, 99% improved group cleanliness after cleaning devices, occult blood test positive rate was 3.66% and 86.33%, and the cleanliness of the equipment in the traditional group after cleaning occult blood test positive rate was 45.33%, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion to standardize manual cleaning plus regulate the use of enzyme lotion, rust remover, rust lubricant cleaning method is ideal primary hospital cleaning method.