CAJ | 학술논문

目的为对比思密达口服与保留灌肠治疗小儿急性腹泻病的疗效并指导临床选择合适给药途径.方法319例小儿急性腹泻病患儿随机分为两组，口服治疗组165例，保留灌肠组154例，在饮食调整、液体疗法、抗感染等相同治疗条件下，口服治疗组给予思密达口服，保留灌肠组给予思密达保留灌肠，均连用3天，观察各组患儿对治疗的依从性及疗效情况.结果口服治疗组患儿较保留灌肠组患儿的治疗依从性差，两组差异显著，有统计学意义(P <0.01)；在余下坚持治疗3d的275例中两组疗效相当，差异无统计学意义.结论思密达口服与保留灌肠治疗小儿急性腹泻病疗效相当，临床选用口服或保留灌肠主要取决于患儿对该治疗方式的依从性.
목적위대비사밀체구복여보류관장치료소인급성복사병적료효병지도림상선택합괄급약도경.방법319례소인급성복사병환인수궤분위량조，구복치료조165례，보류관장조154례，재음식조정、액체요법、항감염등상동치료조건하，구복치료조급여사밀체구복，보류관장조급여사밀체보류관장，균련용3천，관찰각조환인대치료적의종성급료효정황.결과구복치료조환인교보류관장조환인적치료의종성차，량조차이현저，유통계학의의(P <0.01)；재여하견지치료3d적275례중량조료효상당，차이무통계학의의.결론사밀체구복여보류관장치료소인급성복사병료효상당，림상선용구복혹보류관장주요취결우환인대해치료방식적의종성.
Objective For comparison Smecta oral and enema treatment of acute diarrhea in children in clinical efficacy and select the appropriate route of administration. Methods 319 cases of children with acute diarrhea were randomly divided into two groups of child patients, oral treatment group, 165 cases, retention enema group of 154 cases.Adjustments in diet, fluid therapy, anti-infection the same treatment conditions, the oral treatment group received oral Smecta, retention enema group was given Smecta retention enema,all 3 days. Observed in each group of children on treatment compliance and efficacy of the situation. Result Oral treatment group patients compared with retention enema group of children with poor treatment compliance. Significant difference between the two groups, was statistically significant (P <0.01); 3d adhere to treatment in the remaining 275 cases, a considerable therapeutic effect, the difference was not statistically significance. Conclusion Smecta oral and enema treatment of acute diarrhea in effect quite. Clinical use of oral or enema for the treatment of children depends on compliance.