中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
12期
55-56
,共2页
儿科%支气管哮喘%顺尔宁%布地奈德%疗效
兒科%支氣管哮喘%順爾寧%佈地奈德%療效
인과%지기관효천%순이저%포지내덕%료효
Pediatrics%Bronchial asthma%Singulair%Budesonide%Curative effect
目的：研究小儿支气管哮喘的临床特点及采用顺尔宁治疗的临床疗效。方法将我院50例患有支气管哮喘的儿童作为观察组，采用常规治疗联合顺尔宁的治疗方案。再选取同期该院50例支气管哮喘的儿童作为对照组，采用常规治疗方案，7 d后对比2组患者的临床疗效，症状缓解时间及治疗前后的肺功能变化。结果观察组的临床症状恢复时间及住院时间均明显短于对照组；对照组中显效15例，有效25例，无效10例，总有效率80%，治疗组中显效35例，有效13例，无效2例，总有效率96％，两组相比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论顺尔宁用于临床上治疗小儿支气管哮喘具有较好的疗效，加用在常规治疗的基础上具有见效快、疗效好、肺功能缓解明显和不良反应少等特点，值得临床广泛应用。
目的：研究小兒支氣管哮喘的臨床特點及採用順爾寧治療的臨床療效。方法將我院50例患有支氣管哮喘的兒童作為觀察組，採用常規治療聯閤順爾寧的治療方案。再選取同期該院50例支氣管哮喘的兒童作為對照組，採用常規治療方案，7 d後對比2組患者的臨床療效，癥狀緩解時間及治療前後的肺功能變化。結果觀察組的臨床癥狀恢複時間及住院時間均明顯短于對照組；對照組中顯效15例，有效25例，無效10例，總有效率80%，治療組中顯效35例，有效13例，無效2例，總有效率96％，兩組相比較差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論順爾寧用于臨床上治療小兒支氣管哮喘具有較好的療效，加用在常規治療的基礎上具有見效快、療效好、肺功能緩解明顯和不良反應少等特點，值得臨床廣汎應用。
목적：연구소인지기관효천적림상특점급채용순이저치료적림상료효。방법장아원50례환유지기관효천적인동작위관찰조，채용상규치료연합순이저적치료방안。재선취동기해원50례지기관효천적인동작위대조조，채용상규치료방안，7 d후대비2조환자적림상료효，증상완해시간급치료전후적폐공능변화。결과관찰조적림상증상회복시간급주원시간균명현단우대조조；대조조중현효15례，유효25례，무효10례，총유효솔80%，치료조중현효35례，유효13례，무효2례，총유효솔96％，량조상비교차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론순이저용우림상상치료소인지기관효천구유교호적료효，가용재상규치료적기출상구유견효쾌、료효호、폐공능완해명현화불량반응소등특점，치득림상엄범응용。
Objective To study the clinical features of bronchial asthma in children and the clinical effect of singulair on the dis-ease. Methods 50 patients with bronchial asthma in children admitted in our hospital were selected as the observation group, and treated with conventional treatment combined with singulair, and other 50 cases of bronchial asthma in children admitted in our hospital during the same period were selected as the control group and treated with the conventional treatment. The clinical effica-cy, the duration of remission and changes of pulmonary function of two groups of patients 7 d after treatment were compared. Re-sults The clinical symptom recovery time and the length of stay of the observation group were obviously shorter than those of the control group. Of the control group, 15 cases were markedly effective, 25 cases effective, 10 cases ineffective, the total effective rate was 80%. Of the treatment group, 35 cases were markedly effective, 13 cases effective, 2 cases ineffective, the total effective rate was 96%, the differences between two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Singulair has good effect on the clinical treatment of bronchial asthma in children. It has the advantages of quick effect, good curative effect, alleviating lung function obviously and less adverse reactions on the basis of the conventional treatment, and it is worthy of wide clinical application.
