中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
13期
38-39
,共2页
尿常规%镜检法%仪器法%红细胞%白细胞
尿常規%鏡檢法%儀器法%紅細胞%白細胞
뇨상규%경검법%의기법%홍세포%백세포
Urine routine examination%Microscopic examination%Instrumental method%Erythrocyte%Leukocyte
目的：对尿常规检查中镜检法与仪器法的检查结果进行对比。方法选取2012年8月—2013年10月接受尿常规检查者220例，随机分为对照组与观察组各110例，对照组采取仪器法展开尿常规检查，观察组采取镜检法展开尿常规检查，对比两组检查结果。结果观察组阳性检出率（98.2%）及临床诊断符合率（94.5%）显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组亚硝酸盐、潜血及白细胞阳性率（分别为18.8%、44.5%、25.5%）及临床诊断符合率（分别为18.3%、42.7%、24.5%）均显著高于对照组（P＜0.05），红细胞阳性率（10.0%）低于对照组（P＜0.05），符合率（9.1%）间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。结论在尿常规检查中，与仪器法相比，镜检法在亚硝酸盐、潜血及白细胞等检测中更具优势，临床应用价值更高。
目的：對尿常規檢查中鏡檢法與儀器法的檢查結果進行對比。方法選取2012年8月—2013年10月接受尿常規檢查者220例，隨機分為對照組與觀察組各110例，對照組採取儀器法展開尿常規檢查，觀察組採取鏡檢法展開尿常規檢查，對比兩組檢查結果。結果觀察組暘性檢齣率（98.2%）及臨床診斷符閤率（94.5%）顯著高于對照組（P＜0.05）；觀察組亞硝痠鹽、潛血及白細胞暘性率（分彆為18.8%、44.5%、25.5%）及臨床診斷符閤率（分彆為18.3%、42.7%、24.5%）均顯著高于對照組（P＜0.05），紅細胞暘性率（10.0%）低于對照組（P＜0.05），符閤率（9.1%）間差異無統計學意義（P＞0.05）。結論在尿常規檢查中，與儀器法相比，鏡檢法在亞硝痠鹽、潛血及白細胞等檢測中更具優勢，臨床應用價值更高。
목적：대뇨상규검사중경검법여의기법적검사결과진행대비。방법선취2012년8월—2013년10월접수뇨상규검사자220례，수궤분위대조조여관찰조각110례，대조조채취의기법전개뇨상규검사，관찰조채취경검법전개뇨상규검사，대비량조검사결과。결과관찰조양성검출솔（98.2%）급림상진단부합솔（94.5%）현저고우대조조（P＜0.05）；관찰조아초산염、잠혈급백세포양성솔（분별위18.8%、44.5%、25.5%）급림상진단부합솔（분별위18.3%、42.7%、24.5%）균현저고우대조조（P＜0.05），홍세포양성솔（10.0%）저우대조조（P＜0.05），부합솔（9.1%）간차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）。결론재뇨상규검사중，여의기법상비，경검법재아초산염、잠혈급백세포등검측중경구우세，림상응용개치경고。
Objective To compare the result of microscopic method with that of instrumental method in urine routine examination. Methods 220 cases of patients underwent urinalysis from August, 2012 to October, 2013 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 110 cases in each. The control group adopted instrumental method of routine urine examina-tion, and the observation group adopted microscopic of urine routine examination. The results of examination of two groups were compared. Results The positive rate of the observation group (98.2%) and clinical diagnosis coincidence rate (94.5%) were signifi-cantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.05); the positive rate of nitrite, occult blood and white blood cell (which was 18.8%, 44.5%, 25.5%, respectively) and the clinical diagnosis coincidence rate(which was 18.3%, 42.7%, 24.5%, respectively ) of the observation group were obviously higher than those of the control group (P<0.05), the positive rate of red blood cell (10.0%) was lower than that of the control group(P<0.05), the difference in coincidence rate (9.1%) was not statistically significant(P>0.05). Conclusion In urine routine examination, compared with the instrumental method, microscopic method has more advantages in the detection of nitrite, occult blood and leukocyte, and higher clinical value.
