中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
13期
17-18
,共2页
腹腔镜%胃癌根治术%胃癌%疗效
腹腔鏡%胃癌根治術%胃癌%療效
복강경%위암근치술%위암%료효
Laparoscope%Radical gastrectomy%Gastric cancer%Efficacy
目的:探讨腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗胃癌的疗效和安全性。方法选取该院2010年12月—2013年5月期间收治的96例胃癌患者,随机均分为对照组和实验组,对照组患者行传统开腹胃癌根治术,实验组患者行腹腔镜胃癌根治术。比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、淋巴结清扫枚数、术后住院时间和并发症发生率的差异。结果实验组手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、术后住院时间以及并发症发生率均显著低于对照组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组与对照组淋巴结清扫数目差异不大,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹腔镜胃癌根治术具有出血少、切口小、恢复快等优点,临床疗效优于传统开腹手术,值得临床推广。
目的:探討腹腔鏡胃癌根治術治療胃癌的療效和安全性。方法選取該院2010年12月—2013年5月期間收治的96例胃癌患者,隨機均分為對照組和實驗組,對照組患者行傳統開腹胃癌根治術,實驗組患者行腹腔鏡胃癌根治術。比較兩組患者手術時間、術中齣血量、切口長度、淋巴結清掃枚數、術後住院時間和併髮癥髮生率的差異。結果實驗組手術時間、術中齣血量、切口長度、術後住院時間以及併髮癥髮生率均顯著低于對照組,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。實驗組與對照組淋巴結清掃數目差異不大,組間比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論腹腔鏡胃癌根治術具有齣血少、切口小、恢複快等優點,臨床療效優于傳統開腹手術,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토복강경위암근치술치료위암적료효화안전성。방법선취해원2010년12월—2013년5월기간수치적96례위암환자,수궤균분위대조조화실험조,대조조환자행전통개복위암근치술,실험조환자행복강경위암근치술。비교량조환자수술시간、술중출혈량、절구장도、림파결청소매수、술후주원시간화병발증발생솔적차이。결과실험조수술시간、술중출혈량、절구장도、술후주원시간이급병발증발생솔균현저저우대조조,량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。실험조여대조조림파결청소수목차이불대,조간비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론복강경위암근치술구유출혈소、절구소、회복쾌등우점,림상료효우우전통개복수술,치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods 96 cases of patients with gastric cancer admitted in our hospital from December, 2010 to May, 2013 were randomly di-vided into the control group and the experimental group. The control group was treated with traditional open radical gastrectomy;and the experimental group was treated with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, inci-sion length, the amount of cleaned lymph nodes, postoperative length of stay and postoperative complication rate of two groups were compared. Results The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, postoperative length of stay and postopera-tive complication rate of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group, the differences were statis-tically significant (P<0.05). The difference in the amount of cleaned lymph nodes between the experimental group and the control group was not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy has the advantages of less blood loss, smaller incisions, faster recovery and so on, and its efficacy is better than that of traditional open radical gastrectomy, which is worthy of application in clinical practice.