CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨家庭类型与学生获得性知识的渠道的可能关联。方法采用调查问卷,调查辽宁省25710名12-23岁学生。结果广电/书刊、黄书/音像、互联网、同学/朋友、学校、家长、医生、其他等8个途径，核心家庭、大家庭、单亲家庭、重组家庭、隔代家庭等5类家庭类型之间，女生的差异都没有统计学意义，男生只有学校这1个途径,5类家庭的差异有统计学意义（=12.330， P=0.015）。结论家庭类型与学生获得性知识的渠道的关联不明显。
목적：탐토가정류형여학생획득성지식적거도적가능관련。방법채용조사문권,조사요녕성25710명12-23세학생。결과엄전/서간、황서/음상、호련망、동학/붕우、학교、가장、의생、기타등8개도경，핵심가정、대가정、단친가정、중조가정、격대가정등5류가정류형지간，녀생적차이도몰유통계학의의，남생지유학교저1개도경,5류가정적차이유통계학의의（=12.330， P=0.015）。결론가정류형여학생획득성지식적거도적관련불명현。
Objective To investigate the relationship between the sources of sexual knowledge (SSK) and family types (FT). Methods In Liaoning province,25 710 students aged 12 to 23 years old were surveyed with special questionnaires. Eight kinds of SSK conclude broadcast/television/book/magazine, porno, Internet, companion, school, genearch, doctor, others. Five kinds of FT conclude nuclear family, extended family, single-parent family, reconstructed family, grandparents family. Results For female students, for eight kinds of SSK, the difference among five kinds of FT were not significant.For male, for eight kinds of SSK, only “school”, the difference among five kinds of FT were significant. Conclusion There is rare relationship between the SSK and FT.