CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较分析微柱凝胶法和凝聚胺法在交叉配血试验中的应用效果。方法：对我院2013年1月至2014年1月收治的1278例受血者为研究对象，并对这些患者用微柱凝胶法和凝聚胺技术联合进行交叉配血试验，比较两种交叉配血试验在实际工作中的应用效果。结果：微柱凝胶法配血不合有6例，凝聚胺法配血不合有5例，两种方法配血均不合4例，两组没有显著性差异（P>0.05）。结论：微柱凝胶法和凝聚胺法各自有自己的优缺点，在配血工作中应该联合使用，才能有利于提高输血的安全性，更适合临床使用。
목적：비교분석미주응효법화응취알법재교차배혈시험중적응용효과。방법：대아원2013년1월지2014년1월수치적1278례수혈자위연구대상，병대저사환자용미주응효법화응취알기술연합진행교차배혈시험，비교량충교차배혈시험재실제공작중적응용효과。결과：미주응효법배혈불합유6례，응취알법배혈불합유5례，량충방법배혈균불합4례，량조몰유현저성차이（P>0.05）。결론：미주응효법화응취알법각자유자기적우결점，재배혈공작중응해연합사용，재능유리우제고수혈적안전성，경괄합림상사용。
Objective: To compare the analysis of micro-gel method and polybrene method crossmatch test application results. Methods: Hospital from January 2013 to January 2014 recipients treated 1,278 cases for the study, and these patients were treated with micro-gel method and technology joint polybrene crossmatch test, comparing the two cross blood test results with application in practical work. Results: The micro-gel method with sub-six cases of blood, with blood substandard polybrene method has five cases, two methods were substandard four cases with blood, there is no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The micro gel method and polybrene method has its own advantages and disadvantages of each, should be used in conjunction with blood work in order to help improve the safety of blood transfusions, more suitable for clinical use.