中外健康文摘
中外健康文摘
중외건강문적
WORLD HEALTH DIGEST
2014年
9期
8-8
,共1页
胆汁反流性胃炎%蒿芩清胆汤%辨证论治
膽汁反流性胃炎%蒿芩清膽湯%辨證論治
담즙반류성위염%호금청담탕%변증론치
Bile reflux gastritis%Haoqinqingdan decoction%Differential treatment
目的：观察中药对胆汁反流性胃炎的临床疗效。方法：将90例患者按入组先后顺序平均分为2组。对照组采用莫沙比利联合铝碳酸镁片治疗，观察组在对照组基础上加用中药蒿芩清胆汤加减治疗。2组患者均连续治疗14d，记录治疗后患者临床症状积分、胆汁反流及黏膜炎症改变情况。结果：观察组、对照组总有效率分别为93.33%、82.22%，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。2组患者治疗后各项临床症状积分均降低，与本组治疗前比较，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.01）。治疗后组间比较，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论：在常规西药治疗基础上，加用中药蒿芩清胆汤加减，可有效改善胆汁反流性胃炎患者的临床症状、胆汁反流及黏膜炎症，临床疗效优于单纯莫沙比利和铝碳酸镁片治疗。
目的：觀察中藥對膽汁反流性胃炎的臨床療效。方法：將90例患者按入組先後順序平均分為2組。對照組採用莫沙比利聯閤鋁碳痠鎂片治療，觀察組在對照組基礎上加用中藥蒿芩清膽湯加減治療。2組患者均連續治療14d，記錄治療後患者臨床癥狀積分、膽汁反流及黏膜炎癥改變情況。結果：觀察組、對照組總有效率分彆為93.33%、82.22%，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。2組患者治療後各項臨床癥狀積分均降低，與本組治療前比較，差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.01）。治療後組間比較，差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論：在常規西藥治療基礎上，加用中藥蒿芩清膽湯加減，可有效改善膽汁反流性胃炎患者的臨床癥狀、膽汁反流及黏膜炎癥，臨床療效優于單純莫沙比利和鋁碳痠鎂片治療。
목적：관찰중약대담즙반류성위염적림상료효。방법：장90례환자안입조선후순서평균분위2조。대조조채용막사비리연합려탄산미편치료，관찰조재대조조기출상가용중약호금청담탕가감치료。2조환자균련속치료14d，기록치료후환자림상증상적분、담즙반류급점막염증개변정황。결과：관찰조、대조조총유효솔분별위93.33%、82.22%，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。2조환자치료후각항림상증상적분균강저，여본조치료전비교，차이균유통계학의의（P＜0.01）。치료후조간비교，차이균유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론：재상규서약치료기출상，가용중약호금청담탕가감，가유효개선담즙반류성위염환자적림상증상、담즙반류급점막염증，림상료효우우단순막사비리화려탄산미편치료。
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of TCM decoction for bile reflux gastritis(BRG). Methods: 90 cases were divided into control group and observation group. The observation group were additional y given TCM differential treatment with Haoqinqingdan decoction on the basis of conventional treatment with Mosapride Citrate tablets and Hydrotalcite tablets. Results: Both of the two groups’ symptom scores, bile reflux and gastric inflammation are al eviated after treatment. The total effective rate of observation group and control group respectively was 93.33%、82.22% and the differences had statistical y significant(P<0.05).The differences of symptom scores were statistical y significant (P<0.05) after treatment. Conclusion: TCM differential treatment with Haoqinqingdan decoction on the basis of Mosapride Citrate tablets and Hydrotalcite tablets are effective for BRG.
