中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
16期
87-87,89
,共2页
肺炎%中医治疗%抗生素%体会
肺炎%中醫治療%抗生素%體會
폐염%중의치료%항생소%체회
Pneumonia%Chinese medicine treatment%Antibiotics%Experience
目的:研究分析中医治疗肺炎的方法及疗效。方法:2011年5月-2013年5月收治肺炎患者58例,分成对照组与研究组各29例。给予对照组抗生素治疗,给予研究组中医治疗。结果:研究组治疗总有效率高达96.6%,而对照组治疗总有效率72.4%,两组相比研究组明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:肺炎患者采用中医治疗的效果显著。
目的:研究分析中醫治療肺炎的方法及療效。方法:2011年5月-2013年5月收治肺炎患者58例,分成對照組與研究組各29例。給予對照組抗生素治療,給予研究組中醫治療。結果:研究組治療總有效率高達96.6%,而對照組治療總有效率72.4%,兩組相比研究組明顯優于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論:肺炎患者採用中醫治療的效果顯著。
목적:연구분석중의치료폐염적방법급료효。방법:2011년5월-2013년5월수치폐염환자58례,분성대조조여연구조각29례。급여대조조항생소치료,급여연구조중의치료。결과:연구조치료총유효솔고체96.6%,이대조조치료총유효솔72.4%,량조상비연구조명현우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론:폐염환자채용중의치료적효과현저。
Objective:To research and analyze the method and curative effect of TCM treatment of pneumonia.Methods:58 cases with pneumonia were selected from May 2011 to May 2013.They were divided into the control group and the study group with 29 cases in each.The control group were given antibiotic treatment,while the study group were given the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine.Results:In the study group,the total efficiency was 96.6%.In the control group,the total efficiency was 72.4%. The difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:The curative effect of TCM treatment of pneumonia is significant.