城市建筑
城市建築
성시건축
URBANISM AND ARCHITECTURE
2013年
14期
279-279
,共1页
包容性%可持续设计%幸福%人
包容性%可持續設計%倖福%人
포용성%가지속설계%행복%인
tolerance%sustainable design%happiness%people
许多设计并没有实现“人”的合理参与,事实上从包容性来看,最弱势的群体却往往被排除在主要的设计服务对象之外。本文从两个公共设计的案例入手,将对设计的可持续的思考延伸至对其包容性的关注。对可持续设计的命题“幸福”、“人”进行了反思,然后探究了“以包容性为前提”的原因、要求和关键点。主要集中考虑了设计过程中“人”的相关问题,试图唤醒部分设计决策者对“边缘弱势群体”的关注和包容。
許多設計併沒有實現“人”的閤理參與,事實上從包容性來看,最弱勢的群體卻往往被排除在主要的設計服務對象之外。本文從兩箇公共設計的案例入手,將對設計的可持續的思攷延伸至對其包容性的關註。對可持續設計的命題“倖福”、“人”進行瞭反思,然後探究瞭“以包容性為前提”的原因、要求和關鍵點。主要集中攷慮瞭設計過程中“人”的相關問題,試圖喚醒部分設計決策者對“邊緣弱勢群體”的關註和包容。
허다설계병몰유실현“인”적합리삼여,사실상종포용성래간,최약세적군체각왕왕피배제재주요적설계복무대상지외。본문종량개공공설계적안례입수,장대설계적가지속적사고연신지대기포용성적관주。대가지속설계적명제“행복”、“인”진행료반사,연후탐구료“이포용성위전제”적원인、요구화관건점。주요집중고필료설계과정중“인”적상관문제,시도환성부분설계결책자대“변연약세군체”적관주화포용。
There are many designs is not implemented reason-nable participation of“people”, in fact from the view of tolera-nce, the most vulnerable groups are often excluded from the main service object of design. This article obtains from the two cases of common design, to extend the sustainable thinking of design to the focus of its tolerance. It makes a reflection on the“Happiness”, “People” of the sustainable design proposition, and then explores the reason, requirements and key points of“Tolerance as the premise”. Mainly focus on the related issues of“People”in the process of design, trying to wake up part of the design policy makers focused on the concern and tolerance of“Edge vulnerable groups”.