中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
20期
18-19
,共2页
健康教育%ERCP%康复%影响%分析
健康教育%ERCP%康複%影響%分析
건강교육%ERCP%강복%영향%분석
Health Education%ERCP%Rehabilitation%Impact%Analysis
目的：研究分析经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography，ERCP)病患使用健康教育方式后的康复情况。方法从2011年5月-2013年3月，在该院住院诊治ERCP任意抽取187例病患。用数字法随机分为对照组95例，观察组92例,对照组进行一般性康复治疗，观察组结合健康教育对病患进行诊治。观察对比两组治疗后康复效果。结果观察组病患治疗后急性胰腺炎、急性胆管炎与出血等并发症现象发生者与对照组人数相差不大，但总体要比对照组人数少；观察组产生不适感的人数明显少于对照组，差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。观察组疗效为优人数占比54.35%（50/92），优良率为均明显高于对照组的34.74%（均P＜0.05）。结论健康教育介入经ERCP病患康复可使其恢复效果更加明显，减少病患并发症发生,值得临床推荐。
目的：研究分析經內鏡逆行胰膽管造影(Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography，ERCP)病患使用健康教育方式後的康複情況。方法從2011年5月-2013年3月，在該院住院診治ERCP任意抽取187例病患。用數字法隨機分為對照組95例，觀察組92例,對照組進行一般性康複治療，觀察組結閤健康教育對病患進行診治。觀察對比兩組治療後康複效果。結果觀察組病患治療後急性胰腺炎、急性膽管炎與齣血等併髮癥現象髮生者與對照組人數相差不大，但總體要比對照組人數少；觀察組產生不適感的人數明顯少于對照組，差異均有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。觀察組療效為優人數佔比54.35%（50/92），優良率為均明顯高于對照組的34.74%（均P＜0.05）。結論健康教育介入經ERCP病患康複可使其恢複效果更加明顯，減少病患併髮癥髮生,值得臨床推薦。
목적：연구분석경내경역행이담관조영(Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography，ERCP)병환사용건강교육방식후적강복정황。방법종2011년5월-2013년3월，재해원주원진치ERCP임의추취187례병환。용수자법수궤분위대조조95례，관찰조92례,대조조진행일반성강복치료，관찰조결합건강교육대병환진행진치。관찰대비량조치료후강복효과。결과관찰조병환치료후급성이선염、급성담관염여출혈등병발증현상발생자여대조조인수상차불대，단총체요비대조조인수소；관찰조산생불괄감적인수명현소우대조조，차이균유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。관찰조료효위우인수점비54.35%（50/92），우량솔위균명현고우대조조적34.74%（균P＜0.05）。결론건강교육개입경ERCP병환강복가사기회복효과경가명현，감소병환병발증발생,치득림상추천。
Objective To study and analyze the impact of health education on the recovery of patients with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Methods 187 patients with ERCP admitted in our hospital from May 2011 to March 2013 were randomly chosen and divided into the control group of 95 cases and the observation group of 92 cases. The control group was given common rehabilitation treatment while the observation group was given common rehabilitation treatment combined with health education. The rehabilitation effects of the 2 groups after treatment were observed and compared. Results On the number of patients with complications of acute pancreatitis, acute cholangitis and bleeding after treatment, the observation group was similar to the control group but a little fewer on total number;the number of patients with discomfortable feelings of the observation group was less than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The excellent rate of the observation group was 54.35%(50/92), and excellent and good rate was obviously higher than the control group's 34.74% (all P<0.05). Conclusion Health education can promote the recovery of patients with ERCP and reduce the incidence of complications, which is worthy of being recommended clinically.
