中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
16期
6-7
,共2页
疝环充填式疝修补术%平片式疝修补术%腹股沟疝
疝環充填式疝脩補術%平片式疝脩補術%腹股溝疝
산배충전식산수보술%평편식산수보술%복고구산
Hernial ring filling-style herniorrhaphy%Flat plate hernia repair%Inguinal hernia
对比疝环充填式和平片式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的治疗效果与预后。方法选取该院收治的100例腹股沟疝痔患者作为临床观察对象，随机分为两组。对照组患者使用疝环充填式疝修补术进行治疗，观察组使用平片式疝修补术进行治疗，对比两组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、疼痛时间、治疗效果以及不良反应等资料。结果①观察组与对照组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、疼痛时间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；②观察组患者的治疗总有效率为88.0%，对照组患者的治疗总有效率为90.0%，两者相比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；两组患者的并发症发生率差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）；对照组患者的并发症要明显高于观察组，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论两种术式的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、疼痛时间、治疗效果无差别与并发症发生率无明显差别，但是平片式疝修补术的复发率较低，值得临床推广。
對比疝環充填式和平片式疝脩補術治療腹股溝疝的治療效果與預後。方法選取該院收治的100例腹股溝疝痔患者作為臨床觀察對象，隨機分為兩組。對照組患者使用疝環充填式疝脩補術進行治療，觀察組使用平片式疝脩補術進行治療，對比兩組患者的手術時間、住院時間、術中齣血量、疼痛時間、治療效果以及不良反應等資料。結果①觀察組與對照組患者的手術時間、住院時間、術中齣血量、疼痛時間差異無統計學意義（P＞0.05）；②觀察組患者的治療總有效率為88.0%，對照組患者的治療總有效率為90.0%，兩者相比較差異無統計學意義（P＞0.05）；兩組患者的併髮癥髮生率差異無統計學意義（P＞0.05）；對照組患者的併髮癥要明顯高于觀察組，差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。結論兩種術式的手術時間、住院時間、術中齣血量、疼痛時間、治療效果無差彆與併髮癥髮生率無明顯差彆，但是平片式疝脩補術的複髮率較低，值得臨床推廣。
대비산배충전식화평편식산수보술치료복고구산적치료효과여예후。방법선취해원수치적100례복고구산치환자작위림상관찰대상，수궤분위량조。대조조환자사용산배충전식산수보술진행치료，관찰조사용평편식산수보술진행치료，대비량조환자적수술시간、주원시간、술중출혈량、동통시간、치료효과이급불량반응등자료。결과①관찰조여대조조환자적수술시간、주원시간、술중출혈량、동통시간차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）；②관찰조환자적치료총유효솔위88.0%，대조조환자적치료총유효솔위90.0%，량자상비교차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）；량조환자적병발증발생솔차이무통계학의의（P＞0.05）；대조조환자적병발증요명현고우관찰조，차이유통계학의의（P＜0.05）。결론량충술식적수술시간、주원시간、술중출혈량、동통시간、치료효과무차별여병발증발생솔무명현차별，단시평편식산수보술적복발솔교저，치득림상추엄。
Objective To compare the effect and prognosis between hernial ring filling-style herniorrhaphy and flat plate hernia re-pair in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Methods 100 cases of patients with inguinal hernia hemorrhoids admitted in our hospital from December, 2010 to January, 2013 were selected as the clinical observation subjects, and they were randomly divided into two groups. The control group was treated by hernial ring filling-style herniorrhaphy, and the observation group was treated with flat plate hernia repair. The operative time, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, duration of pain, treatment effect, the adverse re-actions and other data of both groups were compared. Results There were no statistically significant differences in operative time, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss and duration of pain between the observation group and the control group ( P>0.05); ② the total effective rate of the observation group was 88.0%, and that of the control group was 90.0%, the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05);and the difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups was not statistically significant(P>0.05);the complications occurred in the control group were much more than those in the observation group, the difference was sta-tistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion There were no significant differences in operation time, length of stay, intraoperative blood loss, duration of pain, treatment effect and the incidence of complications between the two surgical methods, but the recur-rence rate of flat plate hernia repair is lower, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
