中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
22期
24-25
,共2页
王芃%李铁男%黄山%郎晓峰%李挪%刘伟%张铁岩
王芃%李鐵男%黃山%郎曉峰%李挪%劉偉%張鐵巖
왕봉%리철남%황산%랑효봉%리나%류위%장철암
颅内动脉瘤%破裂%急诊%血管内治疗%显微手术
顱內動脈瘤%破裂%急診%血管內治療%顯微手術
로내동맥류%파렬%급진%혈관내치료%현미수술
Intracranial aneurysm%Rupture%Emergency%Endovascular treatment%Microsurgery
目的:探讨破裂颅内动脉瘤行急诊外科治疗的疗效。方法:回顾147例破裂颅内动脉瘤患者,急诊血管内治疗84例85个动脉瘤,显微手术组63例64个动脉瘤,以出院mRS分级0~2级为预后良好,结合年龄及Hunt-Hess分级对比两种术式预后。结果:两种术式总体预后良好率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。当患者≥65岁时,血管内治疗预后良好率显著好于显微手术(P<0.05);当患者<65岁时预后良好率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。无论Hunt-Hess 1~3级和4~5级,两种术式预后良好率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。血管内治疗总体并发症及癫痫发生率显著低于显微手术。结论:显微手术和血管内治疗是破裂颅内动脉瘤急诊治疗的有效方法,血管内治疗手术风险更低,尤其适合老年及后循环动脉瘤。
目的:探討破裂顱內動脈瘤行急診外科治療的療效。方法:迴顧147例破裂顱內動脈瘤患者,急診血管內治療84例85箇動脈瘤,顯微手術組63例64箇動脈瘤,以齣院mRS分級0~2級為預後良好,結閤年齡及Hunt-Hess分級對比兩種術式預後。結果:兩種術式總體預後良好率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。噹患者≥65歲時,血管內治療預後良好率顯著好于顯微手術(P<0.05);噹患者<65歲時預後良好率差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。無論Hunt-Hess 1~3級和4~5級,兩種術式預後良好率差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。血管內治療總體併髮癥及癲癇髮生率顯著低于顯微手術。結論:顯微手術和血管內治療是破裂顱內動脈瘤急診治療的有效方法,血管內治療手術風險更低,尤其適閤老年及後循環動脈瘤。
목적:탐토파렬로내동맥류행급진외과치료적료효。방법:회고147례파렬로내동맥류환자,급진혈관내치료84례85개동맥류,현미수술조63례64개동맥류,이출원mRS분급0~2급위예후량호,결합년령급Hunt-Hess분급대비량충술식예후。결과:량충술식총체예후량호솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。당환자≥65세시,혈관내치료예후량호솔현저호우현미수술(P<0.05);당환자<65세시예후량호솔차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。무론Hunt-Hess 1~3급화4~5급,량충술식예후량호솔차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05)。혈관내치료총체병발증급전간발생솔현저저우현미수술。결론:현미수술화혈관내치료시파렬로내동맥류급진치료적유효방법,혈관내치료수술풍험경저,우기괄합노년급후순배동맥류。
Objective:To explore the curative effect of emergency surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysm rupture.Methods:147 cases with intracranial aneurysm rupture were reviewed.84 cases with 85 aneurysms were treated with emergency endovascular treatment.Microscopic surgery group had 63 cases with 64 aneurysms.According to discharge mRS classification,0~2 grade was favourable prognosis.The prognosises of two kinds of operation were compared with age and Hunt-Hess classification. Results:The overall good prognosis rate of two kinds of operation had no statistical difference(P>0.05).When the patients over 65 years old,the good prognosis rate of endovascular treatment was significantly better than microsurgery(P<0.05).When the patients under 65 years old,the good prognosis rate had no significant difference(P>0.05).Both Hunt-Hess 1~3 and 4~5,there was no significant difference between the good prognosis rates of two kinds of operation(P>0.05).The incidence rates of complications and epilepsy of endovascular treatment were significantly lower than those of microsurgery(P<0.05).Conclusion:Microsurgery and endovascular treatment are the effective method for the emergency treatment of intracranial aneurysm rupture.The endovascular treatment has low operation risk.It is especially for the elderly and the posterior circulation aneurysms.