现代临床护理
現代臨床護理
현대림상호리
MODERN CLINICAL NURSING
2014年
8期
34-36
,共3页
宁小玲%欧阳荣超%蒋红霞%余雅玲
寧小玲%歐暘榮超%蔣紅霞%餘雅玲
저소령%구양영초%장홍하%여아령
吸氧%重症监护室%护理
吸氧%重癥鑑護室%護理
흡양%중증감호실%호리
oxygen inhalation%ICU%nursing
目的:探讨无湿化中低流量鼻道管吸氧在重症监护室(intensive care unit,ICU)患者中的应用效果。方法将400例在ICU住院,需要持续中低流量吸氧24 h以上的患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各200例。实验组患者使用干燥湿化瓶直接吸氧,对照组患者使用湿化瓶吸氧。比较两组患者吸氧24 h后呼吸道反应,湿化瓶细菌污染,患者对吸氧噪声反映情况及护士更换湿化瓶所需时间。结果两组患者氧疗后不适症状与各项指标比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);两组患者湿化瓶细菌污染情况、患者感觉噪声、护士更换湿化瓶所需时间比较,均P<0.05或P<0.01,实验组细菌污染阳性率明显低于对照组,患者感觉吸氧噪声情况明显少于对照组,护士更换湿化瓶时间明显短于对照组。结论中低流量患者采用无湿化吸氧有利于降低湿化瓶细菌污染情况,减少工作量及吸氧噪声,值得临床推广应用。
目的:探討無濕化中低流量鼻道管吸氧在重癥鑑護室(intensive care unit,ICU)患者中的應用效果。方法將400例在ICU住院,需要持續中低流量吸氧24 h以上的患者,隨機分為實驗組和對照組,每組各200例。實驗組患者使用榦燥濕化瓶直接吸氧,對照組患者使用濕化瓶吸氧。比較兩組患者吸氧24 h後呼吸道反應,濕化瓶細菌汙染,患者對吸氧譟聲反映情況及護士更換濕化瓶所需時間。結果兩組患者氧療後不適癥狀與各項指標比較,差異無統計學意義(均P>0.05);兩組患者濕化瓶細菌汙染情況、患者感覺譟聲、護士更換濕化瓶所需時間比較,均P<0.05或P<0.01,實驗組細菌汙染暘性率明顯低于對照組,患者感覺吸氧譟聲情況明顯少于對照組,護士更換濕化瓶時間明顯短于對照組。結論中低流量患者採用無濕化吸氧有利于降低濕化瓶細菌汙染情況,減少工作量及吸氧譟聲,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:탐토무습화중저류량비도관흡양재중증감호실(intensive care unit,ICU)환자중적응용효과。방법장400례재ICU주원,수요지속중저류량흡양24 h이상적환자,수궤분위실험조화대조조,매조각200례。실험조환자사용간조습화병직접흡양,대조조환자사용습화병흡양。비교량조환자흡양24 h후호흡도반응,습화병세균오염,환자대흡양조성반영정황급호사경환습화병소수시간。결과량조환자양료후불괄증상여각항지표비교,차이무통계학의의(균P>0.05);량조환자습화병세균오염정황、환자감각조성、호사경환습화병소수시간비교,균P<0.05혹P<0.01,실험조세균오염양성솔명현저우대조조,환자감각흡양조성정황명현소우대조조,호사경환습화병시간명현단우대조조。결론중저류량환자채용무습화흡양유리우강저습화병세균오염정황,감소공작량급흡양조성,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the afflication of non-humidified low flow nasal oxygen inhalation in the ICU patients. Methods Four hundred patients hospitalized in ICU and needing continuous low-flow oxygen inhalation for more than 24 h were randomly divided into experiment group and control group equally.The experiment group were managed with dried humidification bottle oxygen inhalation and the control group conventional humidified bottle oxygen inhalation.The two groups were compared in terms of 24 h respiratory reactions,bacterial contamination of the humidified bottle,complaints of patients about oxygen inhalation noises and time for nurses to change the humidified bottles.Results The two groups had no significant difference in adverse symptoms(all P>0.05).The rate of bacterial contamination in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group(P<0.05),the noises were lower and the time for changing the bottle shorter(P<0.05).Conclusion Non-humidified low flow nasal oxygen inhalation in ICU patients is good for reducing the rate of bacterial contamination of humidified bottle and lowering workload and oxygen-inhaling noises.