中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2014年
32期
102-102,104
,共2页
磁共振%关节镜%膝关节%韧带损伤
磁共振%關節鏡%膝關節%韌帶損傷
자공진%관절경%슬관절%인대손상
Magnetic resonance%Arthroscopy%Knee joint%Ligament injury
目的：探讨磁共振与关节镜应用于膝关节韧带损伤的临床诊断价值。方法：2013年3月-2014年3月收治膝关节韧带损伤患者84例，研究组42例予磁共振诊断，对照组42例予关节镜诊断，分析两组患者诊断结果、效果与安全性。结果：两组对膝关节各部位损伤诊断真阳性率比较差异不明显，无统计学意义(P＞0.05)；研究组诊断特异度95.27%，灵敏度各部位均100%，符合率97.19%；研究组诊断后并发症发生率4.76%，明显低于对照组的7.14%，比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：磁共振在膝关节韧带损伤诊断中具有一定可行性与安全性。
目的：探討磁共振與關節鏡應用于膝關節韌帶損傷的臨床診斷價值。方法：2013年3月-2014年3月收治膝關節韌帶損傷患者84例，研究組42例予磁共振診斷，對照組42例予關節鏡診斷，分析兩組患者診斷結果、效果與安全性。結果：兩組對膝關節各部位損傷診斷真暘性率比較差異不明顯，無統計學意義(P＞0.05)；研究組診斷特異度95.27%，靈敏度各部位均100%，符閤率97.19%；研究組診斷後併髮癥髮生率4.76%，明顯低于對照組的7.14%，比較差異具有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。結論：磁共振在膝關節韌帶損傷診斷中具有一定可行性與安全性。
목적：탐토자공진여관절경응용우슬관절인대손상적림상진단개치。방법：2013년3월-2014년3월수치슬관절인대손상환자84례，연구조42례여자공진진단，대조조42례여관절경진단，분석량조환자진단결과、효과여안전성。결과：량조대슬관절각부위손상진단진양성솔비교차이불명현，무통계학의의(P＞0.05)；연구조진단특이도95.27%，령민도각부위균100%，부합솔97.19%；연구조진단후병발증발생솔4.76%，명현저우대조조적7.14%，비교차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론：자공진재슬관절인대손상진단중구유일정가행성여안전성。
Objective:To investigate the application value of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy in the diagnosis of ligamentous injury of knee joint.Methods:84 patients with ligamentous injury of knee joint were selected from March 2013 to March 2014.42 cases in the study group were diagnosised by magnetic resonance imaging,and 42 cases in the control group were diagnosised by arthroscopic.Then we analyzed the diagnosis results,the effect and safety of two groups.Results:there was no statistically significant difference in diagnosis of true positive rate of various injuries of knee joint in two groups(P>0.05).The diagnostic specificity of the study group was 95.27%;the sensitivity of every parts was 100%;the coincidence rate was 97.19%.In the study group,the incidence rate of complications after diagnosis was 4.76%;it was significantly less than the control group that was 7.14%;the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion:MRI has feasibility and safety in the diagnosis of knee joint ligament injury.
