现代医药卫生
現代醫藥衛生
현대의약위생
MODERN MEDICINE HEALTH
2014年
22期
3388-3389,3392
,共3页
张献文%冯凯祥%竹建强%王秋蓉%赵红
張獻文%馮凱祥%竹建彊%王鞦蓉%趙紅
장헌문%풍개상%죽건강%왕추용%조홍
芒硝%聚乙二醇类%结肠镜检查%自身耐受性%肠道清洁度
芒硝%聚乙二醇類%結腸鏡檢查%自身耐受性%腸道清潔度
망초%취을이순류%결장경검사%자신내수성%장도청길도
Natrii sulfas%Polyethylene glycols%Colonoscopy%Self tolerance%The intestinal cleanliness
目的:比较芒硝与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的清洁效果及患者耐受性。方法选择2013年8月至2014年5月该院门诊及住院行结肠镜检查的2380例患者,按年龄末位数字的单双数进行分组,其中单数者(1260例)给予精制芒硝做肠道准备(A组),双数者(1120例)给予复方聚乙二醇电解质散做肠道准备(B组),比较两组肠道清洁效果和患者对清洁剂的耐受性。结果两组患者清洁剂使用后的肠道清洁有效率比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.3059,P>0.05);A组患者耐受性较B组好,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.7664,P<0.05)。结论芒硝与复方聚乙二醇电解质散在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中清洁效果相当,但口服芒硝患者耐受性更好,所需的费用更低。
目的:比較芒硝與複方聚乙二醇電解質散在結腸鏡檢查前腸道準備中的清潔效果及患者耐受性。方法選擇2013年8月至2014年5月該院門診及住院行結腸鏡檢查的2380例患者,按年齡末位數字的單雙數進行分組,其中單數者(1260例)給予精製芒硝做腸道準備(A組),雙數者(1120例)給予複方聚乙二醇電解質散做腸道準備(B組),比較兩組腸道清潔效果和患者對清潔劑的耐受性。結果兩組患者清潔劑使用後的腸道清潔有效率比較,差異無統計學意義(χ2=0.3059,P>0.05);A組患者耐受性較B組好,差異有統計學意義(χ2=4.7664,P<0.05)。結論芒硝與複方聚乙二醇電解質散在結腸鏡檢查前腸道準備中清潔效果相噹,但口服芒硝患者耐受性更好,所需的費用更低。
목적:비교망초여복방취을이순전해질산재결장경검사전장도준비중적청길효과급환자내수성。방법선택2013년8월지2014년5월해원문진급주원행결장경검사적2380례환자,안년령말위수자적단쌍수진행분조,기중단수자(1260례)급여정제망초주장도준비(A조),쌍수자(1120례)급여복방취을이순전해질산주장도준비(B조),비교량조장도청길효과화환자대청길제적내수성。결과량조환자청길제사용후적장도청길유효솔비교,차이무통계학의의(χ2=0.3059,P>0.05);A조환자내수성교B조호,차이유통계학의의(χ2=4.7664,P<0.05)。결론망초여복방취을이순전해질산재결장경검사전장도준비중청길효과상당,단구복망초환자내수성경호,소수적비용경저。
Objective To compare the cleansing effect of Glauber′s salt and polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder in bowel preparation before colonoscopy and tolerance of patients. Methods A total of 2 380 patients with colonoscopy in outpatient service or hospitalized from August 2013 to May 2014 were selected and grouped according to the numbers of the last figure ,and the patients with odd figure(n=1 260) were given refined Glauber′s salt for bowel preparation(group A),while the patients with even figure(n=1 120) were given polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder for bowel preparation(group B). The cleaning effect and toler-ance to the laxatives in the two groups were compared. Results The difference on cleaning effect in the two groups had no statis tical significance(χ2=0.305 9,P>0.05);the tolerance of the patients in group A was better than that in group B with statistically significant difference(χ2=4.766 4,P<0.05). Conclusion The cleaning effect of Glauber′s salt was similar to that of polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,but the patients with Glauber′s salt orally have better tolerance with less costs,so compared with polyethylene glycol electrolyte powder,Glauber′s salt has more advantages on bowel preparation.