中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
34期
13-14,48
,共3页
急诊胃镜%胃镜治疗%上消化道出血
急診胃鏡%胃鏡治療%上消化道齣血
급진위경%위경치료%상소화도출혈
Emergency gastroscopy%Gastroscope treatment%Upper gastrointestinal bleeding
目的:分析急诊胃镜及胃镜下治疗在上消化道出血中的诊疗价值°方法收集2013年3月—2014年3月该院收治的120例上消化道出血患者临床资料,以1 d为界限,将24 h内接受诊断和治疗的原则,将患者分为急诊组与对照组,每组均为60例°急诊组患者采取急诊胃镜及胃镜下治疗,对照组患者采取普通胃镜诊治,最后分析两组患者的临床诊治效果°结果急诊组患者确诊率为95.00%,明显高于对照组的81.67%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)°急诊组患者止血时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)°急诊组患者住院时间、输血量明显少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)°结论急诊胃镜及胃镜下治疗上消化道出血,确保较高的确诊率,缩短止血时间,降低输血量,切实保证患者身心安全,值得临床推广°
目的:分析急診胃鏡及胃鏡下治療在上消化道齣血中的診療價值°方法收集2013年3月—2014年3月該院收治的120例上消化道齣血患者臨床資料,以1 d為界限,將24 h內接受診斷和治療的原則,將患者分為急診組與對照組,每組均為60例°急診組患者採取急診胃鏡及胃鏡下治療,對照組患者採取普通胃鏡診治,最後分析兩組患者的臨床診治效果°結果急診組患者確診率為95.00%,明顯高于對照組的81.67%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)°急診組患者止血時間明顯短于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)°急診組患者住院時間、輸血量明顯少于對照組,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)°結論急診胃鏡及胃鏡下治療上消化道齣血,確保較高的確診率,縮短止血時間,降低輸血量,切實保證患者身心安全,值得臨床推廣°
목적:분석급진위경급위경하치료재상소화도출혈중적진료개치°방법수집2013년3월—2014년3월해원수치적120례상소화도출혈환자림상자료,이1 d위계한,장24 h내접수진단화치료적원칙,장환자분위급진조여대조조,매조균위60례°급진조환자채취급진위경급위경하치료,대조조환자채취보통위경진치,최후분석량조환자적림상진치효과°결과급진조환자학진솔위95.00%,명현고우대조조적81.67%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)°급진조환자지혈시간명현단우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)°급진조환자주원시간、수혈량명현소우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)°결론급진위경급위경하치료상소화도출혈,학보교고적학진솔,축단지혈시간,강저수혈량,절실보증환자신심안전,치득림상추엄°
Objective To analyze the value of emergency gastroscopy and treatment under gastroscope in the diagnosis and treat_ment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods The clinical data of 120 cases with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted in our hospital from March 2013 to March 2014 were selected. And the patients were divided into the emergency group and control group based on 1d line, will endorse the principle of diagnosis and treatment within 24h, with 60 cases in each. Patients in the e_mergency group were given the emergency gastroscopy and treatment under gastroscope, and patients in the control group were giv_en the normal gastroscope diagnosis and treatment. And the clinical diagnosis and treatment effect of the two groups were analyzed. Results The diagnosis rate of the emergency group was 95.00%, significantly higher than 81.67% of the control group, the differ_ence was statistically significant (P<0.05). The hemostatic time of the emergency group was obviously shorter than that of the con_trol group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The length of stay, blood transfusion amount of the emergency group were obviously less than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For upper gas_trointestinal bleeding, emergency gastroscopy and treatment under gastroscope can ensure higher diagnosis rate, shorten the hemo_static time, reduce the amount of blood transfusion, firmly guarantee the safety of body and mind of the patients, so they are worth clinical promotion.