中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
30期
1-3
,共3页
全麻复合硬膜外麻醉%单纯全麻%妇科%腹腔镜手术%效果
全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉%單純全痳%婦科%腹腔鏡手術%效果
전마복합경막외마취%단순전마%부과%복강경수술%효과
General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia%Simple general anesthesia%Department of gynaecology%Laparoscopic surgery%Effect
目的:对全麻复合硬膜外麻醉与单纯全麻在妇科腹腔镜手术应用的效果进行比较分析。方法选择2012年5月-2014年5月于该院妇科行腹腔镜手术的患者76例,随机分为两组,对照组38例采用单纯全麻,实验组38例采用全麻复合硬膜外麻醉,并对两组的麻醉效果进行比较与观察。结果两组患者的腹腔镜手术均顺利完成,但实验组患者的麻醉药物用药剂量、苏醒时间要少于对照组,且实验组麻醉后子宫松弛度、平均血压(MAP)、心率(HR)等指标均优于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论于妇科腹腔镜手术中采用全麻复合硬膜外麻醉方法,具有麻醉药物用量少、苏醒时间短、血流动力学平衡、麻醉效果佳等诸多优势,值得在妇科腹腔镜手术中作为首选麻醉方式。
目的:對全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉與單純全痳在婦科腹腔鏡手術應用的效果進行比較分析。方法選擇2012年5月-2014年5月于該院婦科行腹腔鏡手術的患者76例,隨機分為兩組,對照組38例採用單純全痳,實驗組38例採用全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉,併對兩組的痳醉效果進行比較與觀察。結果兩組患者的腹腔鏡手術均順利完成,但實驗組患者的痳醉藥物用藥劑量、囌醒時間要少于對照組,且實驗組痳醉後子宮鬆弛度、平均血壓(MAP)、心率(HR)等指標均優于對照組,組間比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論于婦科腹腔鏡手術中採用全痳複閤硬膜外痳醉方法,具有痳醉藥物用量少、囌醒時間短、血流動力學平衡、痳醉效果佳等諸多優勢,值得在婦科腹腔鏡手術中作為首選痳醉方式。
목적:대전마복합경막외마취여단순전마재부과복강경수술응용적효과진행비교분석。방법선택2012년5월-2014년5월우해원부과행복강경수술적환자76례,수궤분위량조,대조조38례채용단순전마,실험조38례채용전마복합경막외마취,병대량조적마취효과진행비교여관찰。결과량조환자적복강경수술균순리완성,단실험조환자적마취약물용약제량、소성시간요소우대조조,차실험조마취후자궁송이도、평균혈압(MAP)、심솔(HR)등지표균우우대조조,조간비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론우부과복강경수술중채용전마복합경막외마취방법,구유마취약물용량소、소성시간단、혈류동역학평형、마취효과가등제다우세,치득재부과복강경수술중작위수선마취방식。
Objective To compare the effects between general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia and simple general anesthesia used in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Methods 76 cases underwent gynecological laparoscopic surgery in the department of gynaecology of our hospital from May 2012 to May 2014 were randomly divided into two groups. 38 cases in the control group were given simple general anesthesia, and 38 cases in the experimental group were given general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. And the anesthetic effects of the two groups were observed and compared. Results All the patients underwent the laparoscopic surgery successfully. The anesthetic drug dosage used and the awakening time needed in the experimental group were less compared with those in the control group, the uterine relaxation, mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR) and other indicators of the experimental group were superior to those of the control group, the comparison between the two groups had statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia used in gynecological laparoscopic surgery has the advantages of less anesthetic drug dosage, shorter awakening time, more balanced hemodynamics, better anesthetic effect and so on, which is deserved to be the preferred way of anesthesia in gynecological laparoscopic surgery.