CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比分析急腹症病人使用腹腔镜治疗的临床效果。方法从该院就诊的急腹症病人中随机抽选80例,分成研究组和对照组各40例,研究组给予腹腔镜治疗,对照组做常规开腹手术治疗,对比分析两种治疗方法的临床效果。结果研究组有效率为97.5%,明显高于对照组77.5%,P<0.05；且研究组病人的手术时间﹑出血量﹑住院时间﹑并发症等方面明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急腹症治疗中应用腹腔镜手术方法能够减轻病人痛苦,达到微创﹑无瘢痕及并发症少的优点,治疗效果显著增高﹑安全有效,值得临床研究推广应用。
목적：대비분석급복증병인사용복강경치료적림상효과。방법종해원취진적급복증병인중수궤추선80례,분성연구조화대조조각40례,연구조급여복강경치료,대조조주상규개복수술치료,대비분석량충치료방법적림상효과。결과연구조유효솔위97.5%,명현고우대조조77.5%,P<0.05；차연구조병인적수술시간﹑출혈량﹑주원시간﹑병발증등방면명현우우대조조,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론급복증치료중응용복강경수술방법능구감경병인통고,체도미창﹑무반흔급병발증소적우점,치료효과현저증고﹑안전유효,치득림상연구추엄응용。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical effect of laparoscope applied to the treatment of patients with acute abdomen. Methods 80 cases with acute abdomen admitted in our hospital were randomly selected and divided into the study group and the control group with 40 cases in each. The study group was given laparoscopic treatment, and the control group was given the conventional loaparotomy. And the clinical effects of the two treatment methods were compared and analyzed. Results The ef-fective rate was 97.5%in the study group, significantly higher than 77.5%in the control group, P<0.05; and the observation group was much better than the control group in the aspects of duration of operation, amount of blood loss, length of stay, and complica-tions and so on, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For the treatment of acute abdomen, laparoscopic surgical method has higher treatment effect with fewer complications. It is safe and effective, minimally invasive, scar-free and can alleviate the suffering of the patients, so it is worthy of clinical research and application.