中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2014年
28期
51-52
,共2页
腹腔引流管%普外科手术%术后并发症%临床治愈率
腹腔引流管%普外科手術%術後併髮癥%臨床治愈率
복강인류관%보외과수술%술후병발증%림상치유솔
Abdominal cavity drainage tube%General surgical operation%Postoperative complications%Clinical cure rate
目的:探讨腹腔镜引流管在普外科患者手术中的应用价值,以提高普外科患者临床治疗效果。方法选取某院普外科2012年5月-2014年7月收治的120例患者为研究对象,按照收治时间分为对照组与研究组各60例,对照组实施普外科手术进行治疗》研究组在普外科手术基础上运用腹腔引流管进行治疗,对比两组患者临床治疗效果(术后并发症﹑临床治愈率﹑出血例数)。结果研究组普外科患者通过采用腹腔引流管,并发症发生4例(6.7%)﹑临床治愈54例(90%)﹑出血2例(3.3%),明显优于对照组8例(13.3%)﹑48例(80%)﹑4例(6.7%),取得了比较理想的临床治疗效果,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论通过对实施普外手术患者运用腹腔引流管,能够显著降低患者术后并发症﹑出血几率,提高临床治愈效果,具有较高的临床应用价值,值得在普外科手术中推广使用。
目的:探討腹腔鏡引流管在普外科患者手術中的應用價值,以提高普外科患者臨床治療效果。方法選取某院普外科2012年5月-2014年7月收治的120例患者為研究對象,按照收治時間分為對照組與研究組各60例,對照組實施普外科手術進行治療》研究組在普外科手術基礎上運用腹腔引流管進行治療,對比兩組患者臨床治療效果(術後併髮癥﹑臨床治愈率﹑齣血例數)。結果研究組普外科患者通過採用腹腔引流管,併髮癥髮生4例(6.7%)﹑臨床治愈54例(90%)﹑齣血2例(3.3%),明顯優于對照組8例(13.3%)﹑48例(80%)﹑4例(6.7%),取得瞭比較理想的臨床治療效果,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論通過對實施普外手術患者運用腹腔引流管,能夠顯著降低患者術後併髮癥﹑齣血幾率,提高臨床治愈效果,具有較高的臨床應用價值,值得在普外科手術中推廣使用。
목적:탐토복강경인류관재보외과환자수술중적응용개치,이제고보외과환자림상치료효과。방법선취모원보외과2012년5월-2014년7월수치적120례환자위연구대상,안조수치시간분위대조조여연구조각60례,대조조실시보외과수술진행치료》연구조재보외과수술기출상운용복강인류관진행치료,대비량조환자림상치료효과(술후병발증﹑림상치유솔﹑출혈례수)。결과연구조보외과환자통과채용복강인류관,병발증발생4례(6.7%)﹑림상치유54례(90%)﹑출혈2례(3.3%),명현우우대조조8례(13.3%)﹑48례(80%)﹑4례(6.7%),취득료비교이상적림상치료효과,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론통과대실시보외수술환자운용복강인류관,능구현저강저환자술후병발증﹑출혈궤솔,제고림상치유효과,구유교고적림상응용개치,치득재보외과수술중추엄사용。
Objective To explore the application value of laparoscopy drainage tube in general surgery patients, in order to improve the general surgery patients clinical therapeutic effect. Methods 120 patients admitted in the general surgery of a hospital from May 2012 to July 2014 were selected as the subjects, and divided into the control group and the research group with 60 patients in each according to the admission time. The control group was given the general surgical treatment, and the research group was given abdominal cavity drainage tube for treatment on the basis of general surgical treatment. And the clinical treatment effects (postoperative complications, clinical cure rate and the number with bleeding) of the two groups were compared. Results In the research group treated with abdominal cavity drainage tube, complications occurred in 4 cases (6.7%), 54 cases were cured clinically (90%), hemorrhage occurred in 2 cases (3.3%), while in the control group, complications occurred in 8 cases (13.3%), 48 cases (80%) were cured clinically, hemorrhage occurred in 4 cases (6.7%), the clinical treatment effect of the research group was more ideal, it was significantly better than that of the control group, the data between the two groups treated statistically had statistically significant differences (P<0.05). Conclusion Abdominal cavity drainage tube given to the patients underwent general surgical operation, can significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative complications and bleeding, improve the clinical treatment effect with high clinical value, which is worthy of promotion and application in general surgical operation.