中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
14期
74-75
,共2页
牙周炎%牙龈指数%出血指数%派丽奥软膏%甲硝唑
牙週炎%牙齦指數%齣血指數%派麗奧軟膏%甲硝唑
아주염%아간지수%출혈지수%파려오연고%갑초서
Periodontitis%Gingival index%Bleeding index%Periocline ointment%Metronidazole
目的：探讨不同方法治疗牙周炎的临床效果，为临床工作者提供参考。方法：2013年12月-2014年12月收治牙周炎患者88例，对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。按随机数字表法将88例患者分为观察组和对照组，观察组(n=44)给予派丽奥软膏治疗，疗程2周；对照组(n=44)给予甲硝唑治疗，疗程2周。比较两组患者的治疗效果、牙龈指数和出血指数。结果：经过2周治疗，观察组痊愈7例，显效18例，有效16例，无效3例，有效率93.18%；对照组痊愈5例，显效15例，有效16例，无效8例，有效率72.73%，组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。观察组平均牙龈指数和出血指数分别为(0.78±0.12)和(0.77±0.21)，对照组平均牙龈指数和出血指数分别为(1.78±0.31)和(1.97±0.47)，组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论：派丽奥软膏治疗慢性牙周炎的临床效果佳，具有显著的应用价值，值得推广应用。
目的：探討不同方法治療牙週炎的臨床效果，為臨床工作者提供參攷。方法：2013年12月-2014年12月收治牙週炎患者88例，對其臨床資料進行迴顧性分析。按隨機數字錶法將88例患者分為觀察組和對照組，觀察組(n=44)給予派麗奧軟膏治療，療程2週；對照組(n=44)給予甲硝唑治療，療程2週。比較兩組患者的治療效果、牙齦指數和齣血指數。結果：經過2週治療，觀察組痊愈7例，顯效18例，有效16例，無效3例，有效率93.18%；對照組痊愈5例，顯效15例，有效16例，無效8例，有效率72.73%，組間比較差異具有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。觀察組平均牙齦指數和齣血指數分彆為(0.78±0.12)和(0.77±0.21)，對照組平均牙齦指數和齣血指數分彆為(1.78±0.31)和(1.97±0.47)，組間比較差異具有統計學意義(P＜0.05)。結論：派麗奧軟膏治療慢性牙週炎的臨床效果佳，具有顯著的應用價值，值得推廣應用。
목적：탐토불동방법치료아주염적림상효과，위림상공작자제공삼고。방법：2013년12월-2014년12월수치아주염환자88례，대기림상자료진행회고성분석。안수궤수자표법장88례환자분위관찰조화대조조，관찰조(n=44)급여파려오연고치료，료정2주；대조조(n=44)급여갑초서치료，료정2주。비교량조환자적치료효과、아간지수화출혈지수。결과：경과2주치료，관찰조전유7례，현효18례，유효16례，무효3례，유효솔93.18%；대조조전유5례，현효15례，유효16례，무효8례，유효솔72.73%，조간비교차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。관찰조평균아간지수화출혈지수분별위(0.78±0.12)화(0.77±0.21)，대조조평균아간지수화출혈지수분별위(1.78±0.31)화(1.97±0.47)，조간비교차이구유통계학의의(P＜0.05)。결론：파려오연고치료만성아주염적림상효과가，구유현저적응용개치，치득추엄응용。
Objective:To investigate the clinical effect of different methods in the treatment of periodontitis,in order to provide reference for clinical workers.Methods:88 patients with periodontitis were selected from December 2013 to December 2014,and we analyzed their clinical data retrospectively.88 patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method.Patients in the observation group(n=44) were treated with periocline ointment therapy for 2 weeks;while patients in the control group(n=64) were given metronidazole therapy for 2 weeks.Then we compared the treatment effect,gingival index and bleeding index in two groups.Results:After 2 weeks of treatment,7 cases of the observation group were cured,18 cases were markedly effective,16 cases were effective,and 3 cases were invalid,so the efficiency rate of the observation group was 93.18% .However,in the control group,there 5 cases were cured,15 cases were markedly effective,16 cases were effective,and 8 cases were invalid,the efficiency rate was 72.73% ,the difference was statistically significant between two groups(P<0.05).The mean gingival index and bleeding index of patients in the observation group were(0.78±0.12) and(0.77± 0.21) respectively,while in the control group there were (1.78 ± 0.31) and(1.97 ± 0.47),the differences both were statistically significant between two groups(P<0.05).Conclusion:The clinical effects of periocline ointment is better in the treatment of chronic periodontitis,and it has obviously application value,so it is worthy of popularization and application.
