中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
12期
182-183
,共2页
分级检验法%肾脏生化检验%检出率%临床价值
分級檢驗法%腎髒生化檢驗%檢齣率%臨床價值
분급검험법%신장생화검험%검출솔%림상개치
Grading test method%Renal biochemical examination%Detection rate%Clinical value
目的:探讨分级检验法在肾脏生化检验中的临床价值,从而为疾病的鉴别诊断提供科学的理论依据。方法随机选取该院检验科在2012年12月-2013年12月收治的200例接受肾脏生化检验患者作为研究对象,并随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各有患者100例。其中对照组患者单纯使用常规检验方法进行检验,而实验组患者使用分级检验法进行检验,然后与两组患者各自临床资料进行回顾性分析,对比两组患者的检验效果。结果实验组患者对上述三个指标阳性检出率明显高于对照组,通过统计学方法进行检验分析,上述两组间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比较常规的检验方法,使用分级检验的方法对肾脏生化检验患者具有更准确的检出率,因此该方法值得在临床上进一步推广和使用。
目的:探討分級檢驗法在腎髒生化檢驗中的臨床價值,從而為疾病的鑒彆診斷提供科學的理論依據。方法隨機選取該院檢驗科在2012年12月-2013年12月收治的200例接受腎髒生化檢驗患者作為研究對象,併隨機分為實驗組和對照組,每組各有患者100例。其中對照組患者單純使用常規檢驗方法進行檢驗,而實驗組患者使用分級檢驗法進行檢驗,然後與兩組患者各自臨床資料進行迴顧性分析,對比兩組患者的檢驗效果。結果實驗組患者對上述三箇指標暘性檢齣率明顯高于對照組,通過統計學方法進行檢驗分析,上述兩組間的差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論相比較常規的檢驗方法,使用分級檢驗的方法對腎髒生化檢驗患者具有更準確的檢齣率,因此該方法值得在臨床上進一步推廣和使用。
목적:탐토분급검험법재신장생화검험중적림상개치,종이위질병적감별진단제공과학적이론의거。방법수궤선취해원검험과재2012년12월-2013년12월수치적200례접수신장생화검험환자작위연구대상,병수궤분위실험조화대조조,매조각유환자100례。기중대조조환자단순사용상규검험방법진행검험,이실험조환자사용분급검험법진행검험,연후여량조환자각자림상자료진행회고성분석,대비량조환자적검험효과。결과실험조환자대상술삼개지표양성검출솔명현고우대조조,통과통계학방법진행검험분석,상술량조간적차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론상비교상규적검험방법,사용분급검험적방법대신장생화검험환자구유경준학적검출솔,인차해방법치득재림상상진일보추엄화사용。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of grading method test in the kidney in biochemical test, so as to provide scientific theoretical basis for the differential diagnosis of the disease. Methods 200 cases received renal biochemical test patients from 2012 to 2013 were considered as the research object admitted , and they were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, each group has 100 patients. The patients in control group were tested using simple routine testing method, while the patients in the experimental group using the method of test for inspection and grading, and then two groups of patients with their clinical data retrospectively, compared two groups of patients with test results. Results Patients with the above three indica-tors of positive rate was significantly higher than the control group, analyzed by statistical methods, the differences among the two groups were statistically significance (P< 0.05). Conclusion Compared to conventional inspection methods, using the method of grading test with a detection rate of more accurate on renal biochemical test patients, so this method is worth spreading and using in clinic.