CAJ | 학술논문

目的：对比腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗粘连性肠梗阻(AIO)的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析随机选取的2013年9月-2014年9月该院收治的60例AIO患者临床资料，按随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组，每组30例。对照组行开腹手术治疗，研究组行腹腔镜术治疗，分析两组治疗效果。结果除手术时间外，研究组术中出血量(50.23±6.78)mL、胃肠功能恢复时间(2.74±0.32)d、住院时间(5.28±0.63)d等指标水平均优于对照组，且并发症发生率13.33%低于对照组33.33%，比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜术较之开腹手术可显著改善粘AIO患者手术相关性指标，减少并发症的发生。
목적：대비복강경여개복수술치료점련성장경조(AIO)적림상료효。방법회고성분석수궤선취적2013년9월-2014년9월해원수치적60례AIO환자림상자료，안수궤수자표법분위연구조여대조조，매조30례。대조조행개복수술치료，연구조행복강경술치료，분석량조치료효과。결과제수술시간외，연구조술중출혈량(50.23±6.78)mL、위장공능회복시간(2.74±0.32)d、주원시간(5.28±0.63)d등지표수평균우우대조조，차병발증발생솔13.33%저우대조조33.33%，비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론복강경술교지개복수술가현저개선점AIO환자수술상관성지표，감소병발증적발생。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of intestinal obstruction(AIO) Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgery. Methods A retrospective analysis from September 2013 to September 2014 AIO our hospital clinical data 60 patients were ran-domly divided into study group and the control group, 30 cases in each group. The control group underwent open surgery, laparo-scopic surgery treatment study group to analyze the effect of the two groups. Results In addition to the operative time, blood loss study group (50.23±6.78)mL, gastrointestinal function recovery time (2.74±0.32) days, the length of stay (5.28±0.63) days, and oth-er indicators of water on average than the control group, and the complications The incidence of 13.33% 33.33% lower than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery than open surgery can signifi-cantly improve patients stick AIO surgery-related targets, reduce the incidence of complications.