中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
12期
37-38
,共2页
无痛人流%药物流产%米非司酮
無痛人流%藥物流產%米非司酮
무통인류%약물유산%미비사동
Painless artificial abortion%Drug abortion%Mifepristone
目的：通过临床病例资料分析对比无痛人流与药物流产的临床应用效果，为今后的临床工作提供参考。方法以2012年3月-2014年3月期间该院妇产科行人工流产的273例孕妇作为该组研究的观察对象，分别给予无痛人流与药物流产两种人流方式实现早期妊娠终止，按照人流方式将其分为无痛人流组(151例)与人工药物流产组(122例)，对比两组孕妇的临床治疗效果与安全性。结果①无痛人流组中，完全流产119例，不完全流产32例，治疗成功率为100%；药物流产组中，完全流产66例，不完全流产49例，流产失败7例，治疗成功率为94.26%；无痛人流组治疗效果明显高于药物流产组，差异有统计学意义，P<0.05。②无痛人流组术中出血量为(7.85±5.04)mL、疼痛持续时间为(11.25±8.55)min；药物流产组术中出血量为(12.57±5.37)mL、疼痛持续时间为(42.62±7.79)min；无痛人流组在术中出血量及疼痛持续时间方面均明显低于药物流产组，差异有统计学意义，P<0.05。结论无痛人流治疗的术中出血量少，疼痛持续时间短，而且治疗成功率较高，是终止早期妊娠的理想手段。
目的：通過臨床病例資料分析對比無痛人流與藥物流產的臨床應用效果，為今後的臨床工作提供參攷。方法以2012年3月-2014年3月期間該院婦產科行人工流產的273例孕婦作為該組研究的觀察對象，分彆給予無痛人流與藥物流產兩種人流方式實現早期妊娠終止，按照人流方式將其分為無痛人流組(151例)與人工藥物流產組(122例)，對比兩組孕婦的臨床治療效果與安全性。結果①無痛人流組中，完全流產119例，不完全流產32例，治療成功率為100%；藥物流產組中，完全流產66例，不完全流產49例，流產失敗7例，治療成功率為94.26%；無痛人流組治療效果明顯高于藥物流產組，差異有統計學意義，P<0.05。②無痛人流組術中齣血量為(7.85±5.04)mL、疼痛持續時間為(11.25±8.55)min；藥物流產組術中齣血量為(12.57±5.37)mL、疼痛持續時間為(42.62±7.79)min；無痛人流組在術中齣血量及疼痛持續時間方麵均明顯低于藥物流產組，差異有統計學意義，P<0.05。結論無痛人流治療的術中齣血量少，疼痛持續時間短，而且治療成功率較高，是終止早期妊娠的理想手段。
목적：통과림상병례자료분석대비무통인류여약물유산적림상응용효과，위금후적림상공작제공삼고。방법이2012년3월-2014년3월기간해원부산과행인공유산적273례잉부작위해조연구적관찰대상，분별급여무통인류여약물유산량충인류방식실현조기임신종지，안조인류방식장기분위무통인류조(151례)여인공약물유산조(122례)，대비량조잉부적림상치료효과여안전성。결과①무통인류조중，완전유산119례，불완전유산32례，치료성공솔위100%；약물유산조중，완전유산66례，불완전유산49례，유산실패7례，치료성공솔위94.26%；무통인류조치료효과명현고우약물유산조，차이유통계학의의，P<0.05。②무통인류조술중출혈량위(7.85±5.04)mL、동통지속시간위(11.25±8.55)min；약물유산조술중출혈량위(12.57±5.37)mL、동통지속시간위(42.62±7.79)min；무통인류조재술중출혈량급동통지속시간방면균명현저우약물유산조，차이유통계학의의，P<0.05。결론무통인류치료적술중출혈량소，동통지속시간단，이차치료성공솔교고，시종지조기임신적이상수단。
Objective Through the clinical data analysis of clinical application of painless induced abortion and medical abortion effect contrast, provides the reference for the clinical work in the future. Methods During March 2012 to March 2014 for the gy-necology and obstetrics department of our hospital abortion 273 cases of pregnant women as the study object of observation, were given painless artificial abortion and drug abortion two kind of people realize the termination of early pregnancy, in accordance with the stream of people can be divided into painless group (151 cases) and artificial abortion group (122 cases), the clinical ther-apeutic effect and safety were compared between the two groups of pregnant women. Results ①Painless group, 119 cases of com-plete abortion, 32 cases of incomplete abortion, the success rate of treatment was 100%;drug abortion group, 66 cases of complete abortion, incomplete abortion 49 cases, abortion 7 cases failed, the success rate of treatment was 94.26%; painless treatment group was significantly higher than that in the drug abortion group effect, the differece was statistically significance (P<0.05). ②Painless group bleeding was (7.85±5.04) mL, pain duration was (11.25±8.55) min;drug abortion group bleeding was (12.57±5.37) mL, pain duration was (42.62±7.79) min;painless bleeding during the operation and the amount of the group pain duration were significantly lower than the drug abortion group, the differece was statistically significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Intraoperative bleeding pain-less treatment quantity is little, the pain of short duration, and the success rate of treatment is higher, which is the ideal means of termination of early pregnancy.
