CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨痰液Xpert MTB/RIF法和涂片法检测结核分枝杆菌的结果及二者之间的符合程度。方法对103例临床诊断为肺结核的痰标本做Xpert MTB/RIF法和涂片法检测，并将结果进行比较。结果103份痰液两种方法检测结核杆菌共有72例阳性，阳性率为69.9%，其中涂片法阳性65例，阳性率为63.1%，Xpert MTB/RIF法阳性61例，阳性率为59.2%；两种方法均阳性52例，均阴性30例，总的符合率达79.6%，有12例Xpert MTB/RIF法阴性涂片法阳性,有9例涂片法阴性Xpert MTB/RIF法阳性。二者比较，差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。61例Xpert MTB/RIF法检测阳性对利福平耐药16例，耐药率为26.2%。结论两法检测结核分枝杆菌结果基本一致，二者相互结合更能提高检测阳性率。
목적：탐토담액Xpert MTB/RIF법화도편법검측결핵분지간균적결과급이자지간적부합정도。방법대103례림상진단위폐결핵적담표본주Xpert MTB/RIF법화도편법검측，병장결과진행비교。결과103빈담액량충방법검측결핵간균공유72례양성，양성솔위69.9%，기중도편법양성65례，양성솔위63.1%，Xpert MTB/RIF법양성61례，양성솔위59.2%；량충방법균양성52례，균음성30례，총적부합솔체79.6%，유12례Xpert MTB/RIF법음성도편법양성,유9례도편법음성Xpert MTB/RIF법양성。이자비교，차이무통계학의의(P﹥0.05)。61례Xpert MTB/RIF법검측양성대리복평내약16례，내약솔위26.2%。결론량법검측결핵분지간균결과기본일치，이자상호결합경능제고검측양성솔。
Objective Explore the sputum which MTB/RIF and smear method the results of the detection of mycobacterium tuber-culosis and conform to the degree between the two. Methods 103 cases of clinical diagnosis for tuberculosis sputum specimens which MTB/RIF and smear method detection, and the results were compared. Results 103sputum of two kinds of methods to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis a total of 72 cases with positive, positive rate was 69.9%, the method of smear positive cases61ositive rate was 63.1%, which MTB positive 61 RIF method, positive rate is 59.2%; Two methods are positive for 52ses, 12cases which MTB/RIF negatie smear method is positive, there are 9 cases of smear positive negative which MTB/RIF method. The two compari-son, there was no significant difference (P﹥0.05). Test positive for 61 cases which MTB/RIF method of rifampin resistance in 16 cases, resistant rate of 26.2%. Conclusion Flow method to detect mycobacterium tuberculosis results are basically identical, the two together can improve the detection positive rate.