中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
13期
152-153,158
,共3页
优质护理服务%胸外科%恶性肿瘤%影响
優質護理服務%胸外科%噁性腫瘤%影響
우질호리복무%흉외과%악성종류%영향
High quality nursing service%Department of Thoracic Surgery%Malignant tumor%Effect
目的：探讨优质护理服务对胸外科恶性肿瘤患者的影响。方法整群选取该院胸外科2012年1月-2014年2月收治的65例恶性肿瘤患者为研究对象，随机将其分为两组，对照组患者采取常规护理，观察组患者在对照组基础上行优质护理干预，比较两组患者干预前后SAS评分(焦虑自评量表)、SDS评分(抑郁自评量表)、生活质量及护理满意度评分。结果两组干预后SAS评分[(42.6±2.5)VS(51.4±3.0)]分、SDS评分[(42.0±2.6)VS(51.2±3.4)]分、生活质量评分[(88.2±8.6)VS(75.5±9.4)]分、护理满意度评分[(92.6±6.7)VS(85.2±5.0)]分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优质护理服务能明显缓解胸外科恶性肿瘤患者焦虑、抑郁情绪，提高护理满意度，改善患者生活质量，值得临床推广。
目的：探討優質護理服務對胸外科噁性腫瘤患者的影響。方法整群選取該院胸外科2012年1月-2014年2月收治的65例噁性腫瘤患者為研究對象，隨機將其分為兩組，對照組患者採取常規護理，觀察組患者在對照組基礎上行優質護理榦預，比較兩組患者榦預前後SAS評分(焦慮自評量錶)、SDS評分(抑鬱自評量錶)、生活質量及護理滿意度評分。結果兩組榦預後SAS評分[(42.6±2.5)VS(51.4±3.0)]分、SDS評分[(42.0±2.6)VS(51.2±3.4)]分、生活質量評分[(88.2±8.6)VS(75.5±9.4)]分、護理滿意度評分[(92.6±6.7)VS(85.2±5.0)]分比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論優質護理服務能明顯緩解胸外科噁性腫瘤患者焦慮、抑鬱情緒，提高護理滿意度，改善患者生活質量，值得臨床推廣。
목적：탐토우질호리복무대흉외과악성종류환자적영향。방법정군선취해원흉외과2012년1월-2014년2월수치적65례악성종류환자위연구대상，수궤장기분위량조，대조조환자채취상규호리，관찰조환자재대조조기출상행우질호리간예，비교량조환자간예전후SAS평분(초필자평량표)、SDS평분(억욱자평량표)、생활질량급호리만의도평분。결과량조간예후SAS평분[(42.6±2.5)VS(51.4±3.0)]분、SDS평분[(42.0±2.6)VS(51.2±3.4)]분、생활질량평분[(88.2±8.6)VS(75.5±9.4)]분、호리만의도평분[(92.6±6.7)VS(85.2±5.0)]분비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론우질호리복무능명현완해흉외과악성종류환자초필、억욱정서，제고호리만의도，개선환자생활질량，치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the effect of high quality nursing service on patients with malignant tumor in Department of Thoracic Surgery. Methods 65 patients with malignant tumor admitted in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of our hospital from January 2012 to February 2014 were selected as the subjects and randomly divided into two groups, the control group and the ob-servation group. The control group were given the usual care, while the observation group were given the high quality nursing in-tervention based on the usual care. The scores of Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS), quality of life and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After intervention, compared with the control group, the observation group had much lower SAS scores [(42.6±2.5) VS (51.4±3.0)], obviously lower SDS scores [(42.0±2.6) VS (51.2±3.4)], much higher quality of life scores [(88.2±8.6) VS (75.5±9.4)], significantly higher nursing satisfaction scores [(92.6±6.7) VS (85.2±5.0)], the differences in the above indexes between the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion The high quality nursing service can significantly relieve the anxiety and depression in patients with malignant tumor in Department of Thoracic Surgery, improve the nursing satisfaction and quality of life, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
