中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
13期
52-53
,共2页
高龄患者%心脏永久起搏器植入术%临床效果
高齡患者%心髒永久起搏器植入術%臨床效果
고령환자%심장영구기박기식입술%림상효과
Elderly patients%Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation%Clinical effect
目的:对高龄患者心脏永久起搏器植入术的临床效果展开研究分析。方法整群选取86例2013年1月-2015年1月间在该院通过心脏永久起搏器植入术治疗患者为研究对象,按照年龄分为治疗组和对照组,均为43例,对比治疗效果。结果两组患者心肌穿孔并发症发生率、心室颤动并发症发生率相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗组患者心室起搏阈值和心房起搏阈值同对照组患者之间具有一定差异性,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论心脏永久起搏器植入术在治疗高龄患者临床上效果较为理想,但在患者围术期应有效预防心室颤动和心肌穿孔等。
目的:對高齡患者心髒永久起搏器植入術的臨床效果展開研究分析。方法整群選取86例2013年1月-2015年1月間在該院通過心髒永久起搏器植入術治療患者為研究對象,按照年齡分為治療組和對照組,均為43例,對比治療效果。結果兩組患者心肌穿孔併髮癥髮生率、心室顫動併髮癥髮生率相比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);治療組患者心室起搏閾值和心房起搏閾值同對照組患者之間具有一定差異性,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論心髒永久起搏器植入術在治療高齡患者臨床上效果較為理想,但在患者圍術期應有效預防心室顫動和心肌穿孔等。
목적:대고령환자심장영구기박기식입술적림상효과전개연구분석。방법정군선취86례2013년1월-2015년1월간재해원통과심장영구기박기식입술치료환자위연구대상,안조년령분위치료조화대조조,균위43례,대비치료효과。결과량조환자심기천공병발증발생솔、심실전동병발증발생솔상비,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);치료조환자심실기박역치화심방기박역치동대조조환자지간구유일정차이성,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론심장영구기박기식입술재치료고령환자림상상효과교위이상,단재환자위술기응유효예방심실전동화심기천공등。
Objective The clinical effects in elderly patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation expand research and analysis. Methods 86 patients with permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation by patients, according to age into treatment group and control group were 43 cases, compared to the therapeutic effect. Results Between ventricular pacing in patients treated atrial pacing thresholds and thresholds with two groups of patients in the control group of patients the incidence of complications of my-ocardial perforation, ventricular fibrillation incidence of complications, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) have some differences, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Permanent cardiac pacemaker implantation in the treatment of elderly patients with clinical effect is more ideal, but in patients with perioperative period should be effective in preventing ventricular fibrillation and cardiac perforation.