中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
21期
8-9
,共2页
妊娠期高血压%妊娠晚期%凝血功能%血小板参数
妊娠期高血壓%妊娠晚期%凝血功能%血小闆參數
임신기고혈압%임신만기%응혈공능%혈소판삼수
Gestational hypertension%Late pregnancy%Coagulation function%Platelet parameter
目的:分析妊娠期高血压孕妇妊娠晚期凝血功能变化情况。方法以该院2013年1月-2014年5月收治的50例妊娠期高血压孕妇为研究组,选择同期60例正常妊娠孕妇为对照组,均为妊娠晚期(孕期30~40周),测定并比较两组孕妇凝血相关指标(APTT、TT、PT及FIB)及血小板参数(PLT、MPV及PDW)。结果两组妊娠晚期孕妇APTT(27.84±0.66)s VS(31.13±1.23) s、PT(8.56±0.50)sVS(10.25±0.52) s、TT(10.35±0.72) sVS(12.27±0.86) s及FIB(4.97±0.71) g/LVS(3.82±0.48) g/L,比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。另外两组血小板参数比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论妊娠期高血压妊娠晚期孕妇处于明显高凝状态,加强妊娠期高血压孕妇凝血功能检测,对疾病评估、治疗及预后具有十分重要的意义。
目的:分析妊娠期高血壓孕婦妊娠晚期凝血功能變化情況。方法以該院2013年1月-2014年5月收治的50例妊娠期高血壓孕婦為研究組,選擇同期60例正常妊娠孕婦為對照組,均為妊娠晚期(孕期30~40週),測定併比較兩組孕婦凝血相關指標(APTT、TT、PT及FIB)及血小闆參數(PLT、MPV及PDW)。結果兩組妊娠晚期孕婦APTT(27.84±0.66)s VS(31.13±1.23) s、PT(8.56±0.50)sVS(10.25±0.52) s、TT(10.35±0.72) sVS(12.27±0.86) s及FIB(4.97±0.71) g/LVS(3.82±0.48) g/L,比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.01)。另外兩組血小闆參數比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。結論妊娠期高血壓妊娠晚期孕婦處于明顯高凝狀態,加彊妊娠期高血壓孕婦凝血功能檢測,對疾病評估、治療及預後具有十分重要的意義。
목적:분석임신기고혈압잉부임신만기응혈공능변화정황。방법이해원2013년1월-2014년5월수치적50례임신기고혈압잉부위연구조,선택동기60례정상임신잉부위대조조,균위임신만기(잉기30~40주),측정병비교량조잉부응혈상관지표(APTT、TT、PT급FIB)급혈소판삼수(PLT、MPV급PDW)。결과량조임신만기잉부APTT(27.84±0.66)s VS(31.13±1.23) s、PT(8.56±0.50)sVS(10.25±0.52) s、TT(10.35±0.72) sVS(12.27±0.86) s급FIB(4.97±0.71) g/LVS(3.82±0.48) g/L,비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.01)。령외량조혈소판삼수비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。결론임신기고혈압임신만기잉부처우명현고응상태,가강임신기고혈압잉부응혈공능검측,대질병평고、치료급예후구유십분중요적의의。
Objective To analyze the change on coagulation function to the pregnant women with gestational hypertension in late pregnancy. Methods To take the 50 cases pregnant inpatients as study group which with gestational hypertension and being accepted by our hospital during January 2013 to May 2014, and to select 60 cases as control group which were normal pregnant women in the same period, and both groups were in late pregnancy (pregnancy 30 weeks to 40 weeks). Blood coagulation indexes (APTT, TT, PT and FIB) and platelet parameters (PTL, MPV and PDW) were measured and compared between the two groups. Results The indexes differences (P<0.01) on APTT [(27.84±0.66) VS (31.13±1.23)]s, PT [(8.56±0.50) VS (10.25±0.52)]s, TT [(10.35±0.72) VS (12.27±0.86)]s and FIB[(4.97±0.71) VS (3.82±0.48)] g/L were statistically significant. Platelet parameters between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion Pregnant women with gestational hypertension in late pregnancy was obviously in high coagulation state, and to strengthen examination to coagulation function for pregnant women with gestational hypertension during pregnancy was of great significance for disease assessment, treatment and prognosis.