中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
21期
140-142
,共3页
CNP%手术护理策略%护理效果
CNP%手術護理策略%護理效果
CNP%수술호리책략%호리효과
CNP%Surgical nursing strategy%Nursing efficacy
目的：研究临床护理路径（CNP）在手术室护理中的临床效果及价值。方法利用随机选取法，对2013年6月-2014年10月在该院外科接受手术治疗并住院调理的240例患者为实验对象，随机分为观察组和对比组。观察组患者进行“临床护理路径”模式，对比组患者进行一般性护理模式。观察比较两组患者间在手术后的血压、心率、焦虑（抑郁）状态、手术后并发症发生率、患者对健康常识的达标情况以及满意度。结果经护理，两组心理状况显著好转，其中研究组术后焦虑评分为（52.9±8.10），抑郁评分为（0.59±0.28）；对比组术后焦虑评分为（57±5.99），抑郁评分为（0.59±0.28），二组评分差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论临床护理路径（CPN）对进行手术治疗的患者的术后恢复和健康意识有着明显的效果，提高了整体的手术质量，CPN护理模式具有临床价值意义。
目的：研究臨床護理路徑（CNP）在手術室護理中的臨床效果及價值。方法利用隨機選取法，對2013年6月-2014年10月在該院外科接受手術治療併住院調理的240例患者為實驗對象，隨機分為觀察組和對比組。觀察組患者進行“臨床護理路徑”模式，對比組患者進行一般性護理模式。觀察比較兩組患者間在手術後的血壓、心率、焦慮（抑鬱）狀態、手術後併髮癥髮生率、患者對健康常識的達標情況以及滿意度。結果經護理，兩組心理狀況顯著好轉，其中研究組術後焦慮評分為（52.9±8.10），抑鬱評分為（0.59±0.28）；對比組術後焦慮評分為（57±5.99），抑鬱評分為（0.59±0.28），二組評分差異有統計學意義（P<0.05）。結論臨床護理路徑（CPN）對進行手術治療的患者的術後恢複和健康意識有著明顯的效果，提高瞭整體的手術質量，CPN護理模式具有臨床價值意義。
목적：연구림상호리로경（CNP）재수술실호리중적림상효과급개치。방법이용수궤선취법，대2013년6월-2014년10월재해원외과접수수술치료병주원조리적240례환자위실험대상，수궤분위관찰조화대비조。관찰조환자진행“림상호리로경”모식，대비조환자진행일반성호리모식。관찰비교량조환자간재수술후적혈압、심솔、초필（억욱）상태、수술후병발증발생솔、환자대건강상식적체표정황이급만의도。결과경호리，량조심리상황현저호전，기중연구조술후초필평분위（52.9±8.10），억욱평분위（0.59±0.28）；대비조술후초필평분위（57±5.99），억욱평분위（0.59±0.28），이조평분차이유통계학의의（P<0.05）。결론림상호리로경（CPN）대진행수술치료적환자적술후회복화건강의식유착명현적효과，제고료정체적수술질량，CPN호리모식구유림상개치의의。
Objective To study the clinical effect and value of clinical nursing path (CNP) applied to operating room nursing. Methods 240 cases underwent surgical treatment and hospitalized regulation in the Department of Surgery of our hospital from June 2013 to October 2014 were randomly selected as the experimental subjects and stochastically divided into the observation group and the control group. The observation group adopted the CNP nursing mode, the control group used the general nursing mode. And the blood pressure, heart rate, status of anxiety (depression) and postoperative incidence of complications, status of health knowledge meeting the standard and patient satisfaction were observed and compared between the two groups. Results After nursing, the status of psychology improved significantly in both groups. The postoperative SAS scores were (52.9±8.10) points in the study group, and (57±5.99) points in the control group, the SDS scores were (0.59±0.28) points in the study group, and (0.59±0.28) points in the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion For pa-tients underwent surgical treatment, CPN has significant effect on improving the postoperative recovery and health awareness and increasing the overall quality of the surgery with clinical value.
