中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
21期
129-131
,共3页
交叉韧带重建%关节镜%程序化护理%器械护理%手术配合
交扠韌帶重建%關節鏡%程序化護理%器械護理%手術配閤
교차인대중건%관절경%정서화호리%기계호리%수술배합
Cruciate ligament reconstruction%Arthroscope%Procedural nursing%Care for instrument%Operative cooperation
目的:探讨和分析关节镜下的交叉韧带重建手术的护理配合方法及效果。方法选择该院自2013年10月-2014年9月期间,给予关节镜下交叉韧带重建手术的患者共72例,按随机原则分成观察组和对照组各36例,对照组给予一般常规护理,观察组患者则实施系统化的护理干预,然后对比该两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量和术后康复情况,以及医生和患者的护理满意率。结果观察组患者的手术时间与术中出血量分别(50.78±5.02)min、(56.29±7.15)mL,明显少于对照组患者(80.25±5.93)min、(88.60±9.71)mL,该两组患者的手术时间与术中出血量对比,具有明显的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组合治疗后的1期愈合率和10周后的膝关节功能正常率分别为97.2%、94.4%,明显高于对照组,该两组患者的上述指标对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。此外,观察组护理过程中的医生,满意率和患者满意率分别为100%和91.7%,也明显地高于对照组,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于交叉韧带重建术治疗患者,给予系统化的护理干预措施,能够明显提高护理的质量和效率,属于一种较为科学的护理方法,值得临床推广。
目的:探討和分析關節鏡下的交扠韌帶重建手術的護理配閤方法及效果。方法選擇該院自2013年10月-2014年9月期間,給予關節鏡下交扠韌帶重建手術的患者共72例,按隨機原則分成觀察組和對照組各36例,對照組給予一般常規護理,觀察組患者則實施繫統化的護理榦預,然後對比該兩組患者的手術時間、術中齣血量和術後康複情況,以及醫生和患者的護理滿意率。結果觀察組患者的手術時間與術中齣血量分彆(50.78±5.02)min、(56.29±7.15)mL,明顯少于對照組患者(80.25±5.93)min、(88.60±9.71)mL,該兩組患者的手術時間與術中齣血量對比,具有明顯的差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組閤治療後的1期愈閤率和10週後的膝關節功能正常率分彆為97.2%、94.4%,明顯高于對照組,該兩組患者的上述指標對比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。此外,觀察組護理過程中的醫生,滿意率和患者滿意率分彆為100%和91.7%,也明顯地高于對照組,其差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對于交扠韌帶重建術治療患者,給予繫統化的護理榦預措施,能夠明顯提高護理的質量和效率,屬于一種較為科學的護理方法,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토화분석관절경하적교차인대중건수술적호리배합방법급효과。방법선택해원자2013년10월-2014년9월기간,급여관절경하교차인대중건수술적환자공72례,안수궤원칙분성관찰조화대조조각36례,대조조급여일반상규호리,관찰조환자칙실시계통화적호리간예,연후대비해량조환자적수술시간、술중출혈량화술후강복정황,이급의생화환자적호리만의솔。결과관찰조환자적수술시간여술중출혈량분별(50.78±5.02)min、(56.29±7.15)mL,명현소우대조조환자(80.25±5.93)min、(88.60±9.71)mL,해량조환자적수술시간여술중출혈량대비,구유명현적차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조합치료후적1기유합솔화10주후적슬관절공능정상솔분별위97.2%、94.4%,명현고우대조조,해량조환자적상술지표대비,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。차외,관찰조호리과정중적의생,만의솔화환자만의솔분별위100%화91.7%,야명현지고우대조조,기차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대우교차인대중건술치료환자,급여계통화적호리간예조시,능구명현제고호리적질량화효솔,속우일충교위과학적호리방법,치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate and analyze the perioperative nursing cooperation method for cruciate ligament reconstruction with arthroscope and its effect. Methods A total of 72 cases underwent cruciate ligament reconstruction with arthroscope in our hospital from October 2013 to September 2014 were selected and randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 36 cases in each. The control group was given the general conventional nursing, and the observation group was given the systematic nursing intervention. And the duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative rehabilitation, nurs-ing satisfaction rate of doctors and patients were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had much shorter duration of operation[(50.78±5.02)min vs (80.25±5.93)min], obviously less intraoperative blood loss[(56.29±7.15) mL vs (88.60±9.71) mL], the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(P<0.05). The first intention healing rate and knee joint function normal rate 10 weeks after treatment of the observation group was 97.2%, 94.4%, respectively, which was much higher than that of the control group, respectively with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction rate of doctors and patients of the observation group was 100%, 91.7%, respectively, much higher than that of the control group, respectively, with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion For patients treated by cruciate ligament reconstruction, systematic nursing intervention is a scientific nursing method, which can significantly improve the quality and efficiency of nursing, therefore it is worthy of clinical promotion.