科技情报开发与经济
科技情報開髮與經濟
과기정보개발여경제
SCI/TECH INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT & ECONOMY
2015年
16期
111-114
,共4页
陈霖%刘步平%宋璐%叶少霞%邱灼雄%潘华峰
陳霖%劉步平%宋璐%葉少霞%邱灼雄%潘華峰
진림%류보평%송로%협소하%구작웅%반화봉
装备采购%CNKI%高被引文献%文献计量学分析
裝備採購%CNKI%高被引文獻%文獻計量學分析
장비채구%CNKI%고피인문헌%문헌계량학분석
equipment procurement%CNKI%highly cited papers%bibliometric analysis
目的:分析我国装备采购高被引文献的计量特征。方法:检索中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI)中1979—2014年的装备采购文献,参照普赖斯定律确定高被引文献,用Excel 2010统计分析被引、年份、期刊、作者、单位、关键词、基金。结果:检出装备采购高被引文献216篇,分别被引5~37次,累计被引1913次,篇均被引8.86次;文献数自1998年开始增至2005年达峰值27篇后缓慢下降,分布在97种期刊和4所高校,《实验技术与管理》和《实验室研究与探索》稳居文献数、总被引频次、篇均被引频次前2位;文献作者共349人、署名394次,每篇1~6位,篇均1.82位,总合作率51.85%,最多署名3次;作者机构162个,其中院校占66.05%,43个核心发文机构中院校占88.37%,温州大学以6篇居署名文献数、折合文献数首位;关键词507个、897次,“采购”“仪器设备”“设备采购”“医疗设备”“招标采购”使用频次居前5位;13篇文献获基金16项次,其中省级以下基金占50.00%。结论:装备采购仍是值得关注的热点领域,其高被引文献呈现以《实验技术与管理》和《实验室研究与探索》为权威期刊、以院校为核心发文机构、以医疗和实验装备采购为主要研究对象、以省部级以下项目为主要资助基金的特征,但权威作者、核心团队和代表机构尚未形成,关键词使用不够规范,资助资金偏少,每年新增文献数呈整体下降趋势。
目的:分析我國裝備採購高被引文獻的計量特徵。方法:檢索中國學術期刊全文數據庫(CNKI)中1979—2014年的裝備採購文獻,參照普賴斯定律確定高被引文獻,用Excel 2010統計分析被引、年份、期刊、作者、單位、關鍵詞、基金。結果:檢齣裝備採購高被引文獻216篇,分彆被引5~37次,纍計被引1913次,篇均被引8.86次;文獻數自1998年開始增至2005年達峰值27篇後緩慢下降,分佈在97種期刊和4所高校,《實驗技術與管理》和《實驗室研究與探索》穩居文獻數、總被引頻次、篇均被引頻次前2位;文獻作者共349人、署名394次,每篇1~6位,篇均1.82位,總閤作率51.85%,最多署名3次;作者機構162箇,其中院校佔66.05%,43箇覈心髮文機構中院校佔88.37%,溫州大學以6篇居署名文獻數、摺閤文獻數首位;關鍵詞507箇、897次,“採購”“儀器設備”“設備採購”“醫療設備”“招標採購”使用頻次居前5位;13篇文獻穫基金16項次,其中省級以下基金佔50.00%。結論:裝備採購仍是值得關註的熱點領域,其高被引文獻呈現以《實驗技術與管理》和《實驗室研究與探索》為權威期刊、以院校為覈心髮文機構、以醫療和實驗裝備採購為主要研究對象、以省部級以下項目為主要資助基金的特徵,但權威作者、覈心糰隊和代錶機構尚未形成,關鍵詞使用不夠規範,資助資金偏少,每年新增文獻數呈整體下降趨勢。
목적:분석아국장비채구고피인문헌적계량특정。방법:검색중국학술기간전문수거고(CNKI)중1979—2014년적장비채구문헌,삼조보뢰사정률학정고피인문헌,용Excel 2010통계분석피인、년빈、기간、작자、단위、관건사、기금。결과:검출장비채구고피인문헌216편,분별피인5~37차,루계피인1913차,편균피인8.86차;문헌수자1998년개시증지2005년체봉치27편후완만하강,분포재97충기간화4소고교,《실험기술여관리》화《실험실연구여탐색》은거문헌수、총피인빈차、편균피인빈차전2위;문헌작자공349인、서명394차,매편1~6위,편균1.82위,총합작솔51.85%,최다서명3차;작자궤구162개,기중원교점66.05%,43개핵심발문궤구중원교점88.37%,온주대학이6편거서명문헌수、절합문헌수수위;관건사507개、897차,“채구”“의기설비”“설비채구”“의료설비”“초표채구”사용빈차거전5위;13편문헌획기금16항차,기중성급이하기금점50.00%。결론:장비채구잉시치득관주적열점영역,기고피인문헌정현이《실험기술여관리》화《실험실연구여탐색》위권위기간、이원교위핵심발문궤구、이의료화실험장비채구위주요연구대상、이성부급이하항목위주요자조기금적특정,단권위작자、핵심단대화대표궤구상미형성,관건사사용불구규범,자조자금편소,매년신증문헌수정정체하강추세。
Objective: To analyze the bibliometric characteristics of the highly cited Papers about the equipment procurement in China. Methods:To retrieve the papers about the equipment procurement collected in CNKI database in the period of 1979—2014, determine the highly cited papers with Price law, and carry out the statistical analysis on the citation, years,journals,authors,institutions,keywords and funds by using Excel 2007. Results: 216 highly cited papers about equipment procurement were retrieved out,they were respectively cited 5~37 times and cumulatively cited 1 913 times,and each paper was cited 8.86 times on average;the number of papers was increased year by year since 1998 and reached the peak of 27 in 2005,and then dropped slowly;the papers were distributed in 97 journals and 4 universities, among which,the journals of“Experimental Technology and Management (ETM)”and“Research and Exploration in Laboratory (REL)”firmly ranks the top two in the total number of papers published, total citation frequency and average cited frequency per paper; these papers were written by 349 authors and signed 394 person-times with 1.82 authors per paper on average, the total coauthoring rate was 51.85%, The authors were from 162 institutions among which the colleges and universities accounted for 66.05%,and among 43 core paper publishing institutions the colleges and universities accounted for 88.37%, and Wenzhou University was at the top of the lists of the number of signed papers and the number of reduced papers with 6 papers;507 keywords were used for 897 times,and the use frequency of the keywords of“purchase”“instrument and equipment”“equipment procurement”“medical equipment”and“bidding and purchasing”was ranked in the top 5;13 papers were supported by 16 funds, in which under-provincial funds accounted for 50.00%. Conclusions:The equipment procurement was still the hot areas of concern, its highly cited papers showed that ETM and REL were regarded as authoritative journals,the colleges and universities as the core institutions of paper publishing, the experimental and medical equipment procurement as the main research subject,the under-provincial funds as the main supporting funds, however,the authoritative authors, core teams and representative agencies had not yet formed, the use of keywords lacked adequate standardization, the number of funded studies was less, and the number of newly published papers per year appeared a decreasing trend as a whole.