中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
23期
138-140
,共3页
脐部护理%新生儿脐炎%预防%效果
臍部護理%新生兒臍炎%預防%效果
제부호리%신생인제염%예방%효과
Umbilical nursing%Neonatal omphalitis%Prevention%Effect
目的：研究不同的脐部护理方法对预防新生儿脐炎的应用效果。方法随机抽取该院2013年4月—2014年4月收治的80例新生儿作为研究对象,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各40例。对照组采用常规护理,观察组则加入二次断脐护理措施,比较两组患者的护理效果(脐带平均脱落时间、脐部平均愈合时间、脐部出血情况、脐炎发生率)和家属的满意度。结果观察组的脐带平均脱落时间(3.43±1.15)d明显短于对照组(6.04±1.34)d,两组差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05；观察组的脐部平均愈合时间(6.34±1.06)d明显短于对照组(9.65±1.76)d,两组差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05；观察组脐部出血情况出现4例,明显少于对照组的11例,两组差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05；观察组新生儿脐炎发生率为2.50%,明显低于对照组的17.50%,两组差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05；观察组的护理满意度为95.00%,明显高于对照组的80.00%,两组差异具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论在新生儿常规护理基础上采用二次断脐护理措施,有利于预防新生儿脐炎,提高护理效果,提升护理满意度。
目的：研究不同的臍部護理方法對預防新生兒臍炎的應用效果。方法隨機抽取該院2013年4月—2014年4月收治的80例新生兒作為研究對象,隨機分為對照組和觀察組,每組各40例。對照組採用常規護理,觀察組則加入二次斷臍護理措施,比較兩組患者的護理效果(臍帶平均脫落時間、臍部平均愈閤時間、臍部齣血情況、臍炎髮生率)和傢屬的滿意度。結果觀察組的臍帶平均脫落時間(3.43±1.15)d明顯短于對照組(6.04±1.34)d,兩組差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05；觀察組的臍部平均愈閤時間(6.34±1.06)d明顯短于對照組(9.65±1.76)d,兩組差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05；觀察組臍部齣血情況齣現4例,明顯少于對照組的11例,兩組差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05；觀察組新生兒臍炎髮生率為2.50%,明顯低于對照組的17.50%,兩組差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05；觀察組的護理滿意度為95.00%,明顯高于對照組的80.00%,兩組差異具有統計學意義,P<0.05。結論在新生兒常規護理基礎上採用二次斷臍護理措施,有利于預防新生兒臍炎,提高護理效果,提升護理滿意度。
목적：연구불동적제부호리방법대예방신생인제염적응용효과。방법수궤추취해원2013년4월—2014년4월수치적80례신생인작위연구대상,수궤분위대조조화관찰조,매조각40례。대조조채용상규호리,관찰조칙가입이차단제호리조시,비교량조환자적호리효과(제대평균탈락시간、제부평균유합시간、제부출혈정황、제염발생솔)화가속적만의도。결과관찰조적제대평균탈락시간(3.43±1.15)d명현단우대조조(6.04±1.34)d,량조차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05；관찰조적제부평균유합시간(6.34±1.06)d명현단우대조조(9.65±1.76)d,량조차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05；관찰조제부출혈정황출현4례,명현소우대조조적11례,량조차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05；관찰조신생인제염발생솔위2.50%,명현저우대조조적17.50%,량조차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05；관찰조적호리만의도위95.00%,명현고우대조조적80.00%,량조차이구유통계학의의,P<0.05。결론재신생인상규호리기출상채용이차단제호리조시,유리우예방신생인제염,제고호리효과,제승호리만의도。
Objective To study the application effect of different umbilical nursing methods for the prevention of neonatal om-phalitis. Methods 80 neonates admitted in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014 were selected as the subjects and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 40 cases in each. Both groups were given the conventional nursing, the observation group was additionally given second-severing of umbilical cord nursing intervention. And the nursing efficacy(the mean umbilical cord abscisic time, mean umbilical healing time, status of umbilical hemorrhage and incidence of omphalitis) and patients’ family satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the observation group had much shorter mean umbilical cord abscisic time [(3.43±1.15)d vs (6.04±1.34)d], P<0.05, much shorter mean umbilical healing time [(6.34±1.06)d vs (9.65±1.76)d], P<0.05, obviously less patients with umbilical hemorrhage (4 cases vs 11 cases), P<0.05, significantly lower incidence of neonatal omphalitis (2.50% vs 17.50%), P<0.05, much higher level of nursing satisfaction (95.00% vs 80.00%), P<0.05. Conclusion Second-severing of umbilical cord nursing intervention combined with the neonatal conventional nursing is conducive to preventing the neonatal omphalitis and improving the nursing effect and level of nursing satis-faction.
