中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
CHINA FOREIGN MEDICAL TREATMENT
2015年
23期
76-77
,共2页
显微支撑喉镜%声带息肉摘除术%超声雾化%声带息肉
顯微支撐喉鏡%聲帶息肉摘除術%超聲霧化%聲帶息肉
현미지탱후경%성대식육적제술%초성무화%성대식육
Micro-laryngoscope%Ablation of polyp of vocal cord%Ultrasonic nebulization%Polyp of vocal cord
目的：探讨显微支撑喉镜下手术联合超声雾化吸入治疗声带息肉临床疗效及安全性。方法随机选取2013年2月—2014年2月在该院就诊的80例声带息肉患者采用随机数字的方法分为观察组和对照组各40例，对照组采用电子喉镜下声带息肉摘除术，观察组采用显微支撑喉镜下声带息肉摘除术联合超声雾化吸入，比较二者临床治疗效果。结果观察组炎性反应缓解时间及住院时间均短于对照组，差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1月门诊复查，观察组患者临床治愈率及总有效率均高于对照组，二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者并发症发生率为5.00%，对照组并发症发生率为20.00%，二者比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论显微支撑喉镜下手术联合超声雾化吸入治疗声带息肉，具有显著的临床疗效，安全性高，值得临床推广应用。
目的：探討顯微支撐喉鏡下手術聯閤超聲霧化吸入治療聲帶息肉臨床療效及安全性。方法隨機選取2013年2月—2014年2月在該院就診的80例聲帶息肉患者採用隨機數字的方法分為觀察組和對照組各40例，對照組採用電子喉鏡下聲帶息肉摘除術，觀察組採用顯微支撐喉鏡下聲帶息肉摘除術聯閤超聲霧化吸入，比較二者臨床治療效果。結果觀察組炎性反應緩解時間及住院時間均短于對照組，差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。術後1月門診複查，觀察組患者臨床治愈率及總有效率均高于對照組，二者比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。觀察組患者併髮癥髮生率為5.00%，對照組併髮癥髮生率為20.00%，二者比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論顯微支撐喉鏡下手術聯閤超聲霧化吸入治療聲帶息肉，具有顯著的臨床療效，安全性高，值得臨床推廣應用。
목적：탐토현미지탱후경하수술연합초성무화흡입치료성대식육림상료효급안전성。방법수궤선취2013년2월—2014년2월재해원취진적80례성대식육환자채용수궤수자적방법분위관찰조화대조조각40례，대조조채용전자후경하성대식육적제술，관찰조채용현미지탱후경하성대식육적제술연합초성무화흡입，비교이자림상치료효과。결과관찰조염성반응완해시간급주원시간균단우대조조，차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。술후1월문진복사，관찰조환자림상치유솔급총유효솔균고우대조조，이자비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。관찰조환자병발증발생솔위5.00%，대조조병발증발생솔위20.00%，이자비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론현미지탱후경하수술연합초성무화흡입치료성대식육，구유현저적림상료효，안전성고，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To explore the clinical therapeutic effects and safety of micro-laryngoscopic surgery combined with ultra-sonic atomizing inhalation in treatment of polyp of vocal cord. Methods 80 patients with polyp of vocal cord were randomly divid-ed into observation group and control group, 40 patients each group. The control group was treated with ablation of polyp of vocal cord under an electro-laryngoscope, while the observation group was treated with ablation of polyp of vocal cord under a micro-laryngoscope combined with ultrasonic atomizing inhalation, and the therapeutic effects of the two groups were compared. Results The length of stay and remission time of inflammatory reaction of the observation group were both shorter than those of the control group, and the differences were of statistical significances (P<0.05). Re-examination in the OPD in 1 month after the surgeries showed that the clinical recovery rate and the total effective rate of the observation group were both higher than those of the control group, and the differences between the two groups were both of statistical significances (P<0.05). The complication incidence of the observation group was 5.00%, while that of the control group was 20.00%, and the difference between the two groups were of sta-tistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion Micro-laryngoscopic surgery combined with ultrasonic atomizing inhalation in treatment of polyp of vocal cord has significant clinical therapeutic effects and is highly safe and worthy of clinical generalization and appli-cation.
