中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
24期
155-157
,共3页
消化系统肿瘤%PICC导管%护理体会
消化繫統腫瘤%PICC導管%護理體會
소화계통종류%PICC도관%호리체회
Digestive cancer%PICC catheter%Nursing experience
目的：探讨分析消化系统肿瘤化疗应用PICC导管的护理质量和服务效果。方法该研究随机选取2011年3月-2014年11月在该院接受消化系统肿瘤化疗的患者90例作为研究对象进行研究，将90例患者随机分为两组，实验组和对照组，实验组患者45例，对照组患者45例。对照组采用常规护理，实验组采用PICC导管护理，观察两组患者护理效果和患者不良反应出现几率。结果实验组患者的护理有效率为95.56%，对照组患者有效率为80%，P<0.05表示差异有统计学意义。实验组出现不良护理有5例，发生几率为5.56%，对照组患者出现不良护理有20例，发生几率为44.44%。实验组患者护理满意度为95.56%，实验组患者护理满意度为73.53%。两组患者满意度和并发症发生几率差异有统计学意义，P<0.05。结论PICC导管的应用，可以避免刺激性并发症，避免了穿刺为患者带来的痛苦，有效提高了患者的护理满意度。
目的：探討分析消化繫統腫瘤化療應用PICC導管的護理質量和服務效果。方法該研究隨機選取2011年3月-2014年11月在該院接受消化繫統腫瘤化療的患者90例作為研究對象進行研究，將90例患者隨機分為兩組，實驗組和對照組，實驗組患者45例，對照組患者45例。對照組採用常規護理，實驗組採用PICC導管護理，觀察兩組患者護理效果和患者不良反應齣現幾率。結果實驗組患者的護理有效率為95.56%，對照組患者有效率為80%，P<0.05錶示差異有統計學意義。實驗組齣現不良護理有5例，髮生幾率為5.56%，對照組患者齣現不良護理有20例，髮生幾率為44.44%。實驗組患者護理滿意度為95.56%，實驗組患者護理滿意度為73.53%。兩組患者滿意度和併髮癥髮生幾率差異有統計學意義，P<0.05。結論PICC導管的應用，可以避免刺激性併髮癥，避免瞭穿刺為患者帶來的痛苦，有效提高瞭患者的護理滿意度。
목적：탐토분석소화계통종류화료응용PICC도관적호리질량화복무효과。방법해연구수궤선취2011년3월-2014년11월재해원접수소화계통종류화료적환자90례작위연구대상진행연구，장90례환자수궤분위량조，실험조화대조조，실험조환자45례，대조조환자45례。대조조채용상규호리，실험조채용PICC도관호리，관찰량조환자호리효과화환자불량반응출현궤솔。결과실험조환자적호리유효솔위95.56%，대조조환자유효솔위80%，P<0.05표시차이유통계학의의。실험조출현불량호리유5례，발생궤솔위5.56%，대조조환자출현불량호리유20례，발생궤솔위44.44%。실험조환자호리만의도위95.56%，실험조환자호리만의도위73.53%。량조환자만의도화병발증발생궤솔차이유통계학의의，P<0.05。결론PICC도관적응용，가이피면자격성병발증，피면료천자위환자대래적통고，유효제고료환자적호리만의도。
Objective To investigate and analyze the quality and effect of nursing for digestive cancer patients treated by chemotherapy with PICC catheter. Methods 90 cases with digestive cancer underwent chemotherapy in our hospital from March 2011 to November 2014 were selected for the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, the experimental group and the control group with 45 cases in each. The control group was given the conventional nursing, and the experimental group was given PICC catheter nursing. And the nursing efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions of the two groups were observed. Results The nursing response rate of the experimental group was 95.56%, and that of the control group was 80%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, P<0.05. Adverse nursing events occurred in 5 cases in the experimental group with the incidence of 5.56%, and those occurred in 20 cases in the control group with the incidence of 44.44%, the difference be-tween the two groups was statistically significant, P<0.05. The patients' satisfaction with nursing in the experimental group was 95.56%, and that in the control group was 73.53%, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant, P<0.05. Conclusion For digestive cancer patients, application of PICC catheter can avoid the incidence of irritating complications and the pain caused by the puncture and improve the patients'satisfaction with care.
