中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
24期
44-45
,共2页
Lisfranc关节损伤%可行性%切开复位内固定
Lisfranc關節損傷%可行性%切開複位內固定
Lisfranc관절손상%가행성%절개복위내고정
Lisfranc joint injury%Feasibility%ORIF
目的:研究切开复位内固定治疗早期Lisfranc关节损伤的可行性。方法整群选取2010年6月-2015年2月该院收治的75例Lisfranc关节损伤患者随机分为对照组(n=37,给予闭合复位内固定治疗)和实验组(n=38,给予切开复位内固定治疗),比较两组足部评分和解剖复位情况。结果实验组解剖复位率97.4%明显高于对照组75.7%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,实验组足部评分(91.53±4.83)分显著优于对照组(91.53±4.83)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论切开复位内固定治疗早期Lisfranc关节损伤可显著提高复位质量和治疗效果,具有积极的临床使用和推广价值。
目的:研究切開複位內固定治療早期Lisfranc關節損傷的可行性。方法整群選取2010年6月-2015年2月該院收治的75例Lisfranc關節損傷患者隨機分為對照組(n=37,給予閉閤複位內固定治療)和實驗組(n=38,給予切開複位內固定治療),比較兩組足部評分和解剖複位情況。結果實驗組解剖複位率97.4%明顯高于對照組75.7%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);治療後,實驗組足部評分(91.53±4.83)分顯著優于對照組(91.53±4.83)分,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論切開複位內固定治療早期Lisfranc關節損傷可顯著提高複位質量和治療效果,具有積極的臨床使用和推廣價值。
목적:연구절개복위내고정치료조기Lisfranc관절손상적가행성。방법정군선취2010년6월-2015년2월해원수치적75례Lisfranc관절손상환자수궤분위대조조(n=37,급여폐합복위내고정치료)화실험조(n=38,급여절개복위내고정치료),비교량조족부평분화해부복위정황。결과실험조해부복위솔97.4%명현고우대조조75.7%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);치료후,실험조족부평분(91.53±4.83)분현저우우대조조(91.53±4.83)분,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론절개복위내고정치료조기Lisfranc관절손상가현저제고복위질량화치료효과,구유적겁적림상사용화추엄개치。
Objective To study the feasibility of open reduction and internal fixation in treating early Lisfranc joint injuries. Methods 75 patients with Lisfranc joint injuries admitted to our hospital between June 2010 and January 2015 were randomized into control group in which the 37 patients were treated with closed reduction and internal fixation, and experimental group in which the 38 patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation. Maryland foot score and anatomical reduction were compared between the two surgical methods. Results The anatomical reduction rate was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (97.4%) vs (75.7%); after treatment, the Maryland foot score was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (91.53±4.83) vs (79.59±4.57), and the differences above were both statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of early Lisfranc joint injury can significantly improve the quality of reduction and outcomes, therefore it's worthy of clinical application and promotion.