中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
24期
38-39
,共2页
小切口%阑尾炎%临床分析
小切口%闌尾炎%臨床分析
소절구%란미염%림상분석
Small incision%Appendicitis%Clinical analysis
目的：着重分析在临床治疗中小切口阑尾炎切除术阑尾炎的疗效。方法在2011年5月-2014年5月这个时间段内前来该院治疗的阑尾炎患者中随机选取100例，随机、平均地将患者分为两组，即对照组和观察组，每组有患者50例。其中，采用小切口阑尾炎切除术对观察组病患进行治疗，采用传统阑尾炎切除术对对照组病患进行治疗，从恢复所需时间、切口的平均长度、感染率以及留疤率等方面，对两组进行分析比较。结果观察组的平均切口长度为(3.25±0.25)cm，恢复时间平均为3.2 d，切口的感染率为2%，术后留疤率为4%。对照组切口的平均长度为(6.57±0.64)cm，术后恢复时间为6.5 d，切口感染率为14%，术后留疤痕为16%。两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)，在两组的疗效中，观察组明显优于对照组。结论小切口阑尾炎切除术具有恢复时间短、切口小、感染率低和留疤率低的优点，值得推广。
目的：著重分析在臨床治療中小切口闌尾炎切除術闌尾炎的療效。方法在2011年5月-2014年5月這箇時間段內前來該院治療的闌尾炎患者中隨機選取100例，隨機、平均地將患者分為兩組，即對照組和觀察組，每組有患者50例。其中，採用小切口闌尾炎切除術對觀察組病患進行治療，採用傳統闌尾炎切除術對對照組病患進行治療，從恢複所需時間、切口的平均長度、感染率以及留疤率等方麵，對兩組進行分析比較。結果觀察組的平均切口長度為(3.25±0.25)cm，恢複時間平均為3.2 d，切口的感染率為2%，術後留疤率為4%。對照組切口的平均長度為(6.57±0.64)cm，術後恢複時間為6.5 d，切口感染率為14%，術後留疤痕為16%。兩組差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)，在兩組的療效中，觀察組明顯優于對照組。結論小切口闌尾炎切除術具有恢複時間短、切口小、感染率低和留疤率低的優點，值得推廣。
목적：착중분석재림상치료중소절구란미염절제술란미염적료효。방법재2011년5월-2014년5월저개시간단내전래해원치료적란미염환자중수궤선취100례，수궤、평균지장환자분위량조，즉대조조화관찰조，매조유환자50례。기중，채용소절구란미염절제술대관찰조병환진행치료，채용전통란미염절제술대대조조병환진행치료，종회복소수시간、절구적평균장도、감염솔이급류파솔등방면，대량조진행분석비교。결과관찰조적평균절구장도위(3.25±0.25)cm，회복시간평균위3.2 d，절구적감염솔위2%，술후류파솔위4%。대조조절구적평균장도위(6.57±0.64)cm，술후회복시간위6.5 d，절구감염솔위14%，술후류파흔위16%。량조차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)，재량조적료효중，관찰조명현우우대조조。결론소절구란미염절제술구유회복시간단、절구소、감염솔저화류파솔저적우점，치득추엄。
Objective Focus on the analysis of the clinical treatment of small incision appendicitis surgery for appendicitis. Meth-ods 100 patients with appendicitis, treated in our hospital from May 2011 to May 2014, were randomly selected and divided into two groups, the control group and the observation group, with 50 patients in each group. Among them, the observation group were treated with small incision appendicitis surgery, while the control group with traditional appendix resection treatment. In terms of recovery time, the average length of the incision, the infection rate and the rate of scar formation, the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results For the observation group, the average incision length was (3.25±0.25)cm, the average recovery time was 3.2 d, the incision infection rate was 2%, the postoperative scars rate was 4%. For the control group, the average length of the in-cision was (6.57±0.64)cm, the recovery time was 6.5d, the incision infection rate was 14%, and the postoperative scars rate was 16%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05), and the effect of the two groups, the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. Conclusion Small incision appendicitis surgery, with a short recovery time, small incision scar, low infection rate, and low postoperative scars rate advantages, was worthy of promotion.
