中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
25期
94-95
,共2页
一次性根管治疗%多次法根管治疗%牙体牙髓病
一次性根管治療%多次法根管治療%牙體牙髓病
일차성근관치료%다차법근관치료%아체아수병
One-time root canal treatment%Multiple-visit root canal treatment%Dental pulp disease
目的：探讨采用两种不同的根管治疗方法对牙体牙髓病患者的临床疗效。方法随机选取2012年6月-2014年8月收治的牙体牙髓病患者120例，随机分为实验组和对照组，实验组采用一次性根管治疗，对照组采用多次法根管治疗。并对其临床疗效、并发症等情况进行对比分析。结果实验组总有效率为93.3%，对照组总有效率为80%，实验组总有效率与对照组两组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组并发症发生率5%，对照组并发症发生率20%，实验组并发症发生率与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。实验组患者平均治疗时间与对照组相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对牙体牙髓病患者采用一次性根管治疗临床效果明显优于多次根管治疗，可缩短患者的治疗时间，减轻患者痛苦，且并发症较低，患者较易接受，具有较高临床价值。
目的：探討採用兩種不同的根管治療方法對牙體牙髓病患者的臨床療效。方法隨機選取2012年6月-2014年8月收治的牙體牙髓病患者120例，隨機分為實驗組和對照組，實驗組採用一次性根管治療，對照組採用多次法根管治療。併對其臨床療效、併髮癥等情況進行對比分析。結果實驗組總有效率為93.3%，對照組總有效率為80%，實驗組總有效率與對照組兩組相比差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。實驗組併髮癥髮生率5%，對照組併髮癥髮生率20%，實驗組併髮癥髮生率與對照組相比差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。實驗組患者平均治療時間與對照組相比差異具有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論對牙體牙髓病患者採用一次性根管治療臨床效果明顯優于多次根管治療，可縮短患者的治療時間，減輕患者痛苦，且併髮癥較低，患者較易接受，具有較高臨床價值。
목적：탐토채용량충불동적근관치료방법대아체아수병환자적림상료효。방법수궤선취2012년6월-2014년8월수치적아체아수병환자120례，수궤분위실험조화대조조，실험조채용일차성근관치료，대조조채용다차법근관치료。병대기림상료효、병발증등정황진행대비분석。결과실험조총유효솔위93.3%，대조조총유효솔위80%，실험조총유효솔여대조조량조상비차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。실험조병발증발생솔5%，대조조병발증발생솔20%，실험조병발증발생솔여대조조상비차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。실험조환자평균치료시간여대조조상비차이구유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론대아체아수병환자채용일차성근관치료림상효과명현우우다차근관치료，가축단환자적치료시간，감경환자통고，차병발증교저，환자교역접수，구유교고림상개치。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of two kinds of different root canal treatments for dental pulp disease. Methods A total of 120 cases of dental pulp disease patients admitted to our hospital between June 2012 and August 2014 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group adopted a one-time root canal therapy, while the control group received multiple-visit root canal therapy. Results The total effective rate was 93.3% in the experimental group and 80% in the control group, and the former was significantly higher than the latter, P<0.05.The incidence of complication was 5% in experimental group and 20% in control group, and the former was significantly lower than the latter, P<0.05. The average treatment time of the experimental group was significantly shorter than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion To multiple root canal therapy, one-time root canal therapy was superior in treating dental pulp disease because it can shorten the duration of treatment, alleviate patient's pain with less complication and high satisfaction.
