CAJ | 학술논문

目的：探讨中西医结合治疗胸腰椎压缩性骨折的疗效及可行性。方法随机选取2010年7月-2014年7月间在娄底市第三人民医院接受治疗的胸腰椎压缩性骨折患者100例，采用随机数字表法分为对照组(50例，行西医常规治疗)和观察组(50例，加用中医治疗)，对两组临床疗效及疼痛情况进行比较。结果随访1年，观察组总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)；治疗1周、1个月及6个月后，观察组VAS评分均明显低于对照组(P<0.05)，二者差异有统计学意义。结论中西医结合治疗胸腰椎压缩骨折效果显著，值得临床推广应用。
목적：탐토중서의결합치료흉요추압축성골절적료효급가행성。방법수궤선취2010년7월-2014년7월간재루저시제삼인민의원접수치료적흉요추압축성골절환자100례，채용수궤수자표법분위대조조(50례，행서의상규치료)화관찰조(50례，가용중의치료)，대량조림상료효급동통정황진행비교。결과수방1년，관찰조총유효솔명현고우대조조(P<0.05)；치료1주、1개월급6개월후，관찰조VAS평분균명현저우대조조(P<0.05)，이자차이유통계학의의。결론중서의결합치료흉요추압축골절효과현저，치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To investigate the effect of combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine for the treatment of thoracolumbar compression fracture efficacy and feasibility. Methods One hundred patients with thoracolumbar vertebral compres-sion fractures from July 2010 to July 2014 in Loudi No. 3 People's Hospital were randomly divided into control group (routine treatment in 50 cases, for Western Medicine) and observation group (50 cases, treated with Chinese medicine treatment), the two groups were compared the clinical efficacy and pain. Results During a follow-up of 1 years, the total efficiency of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05); the treatment of 1 weeks, 1 months and 6 months later, the VAS score of the observation group were significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), there was significant difference be-tween the two groups. Conclusion The combination of traditional Chinese and Western medicine in treatment of thoracolumbar compression fracture effect is significant, worthy of clinical application.