中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
28期
176-178
,共3页
早期护理干预%儿科护理%小儿肺炎
早期護理榦預%兒科護理%小兒肺炎
조기호리간예%인과호리%소인폐염
Early nursing intervention%Pediatric nursing%Infantile pneumonia
目的 探讨和分析早期护理干预对于小儿肺炎的临床护理效果. 方法 整群选取2013年3月—2014年2月间,该院医治的130例小儿肺炎患者为对照组;2014年3月—2015年2月间, 该院医治的130例小儿肺炎患者为观察组. 在临床中,对于对照组只进行传统护理;对观察组则在早期进行系统护理,且有针对性的护理干预,对二者的疗效进行比较. 结果观察组患儿的咳嗽、发热、肺部啰音的症状改善时间分别为(5.51±1.41)、(4.82±1.19)和(6.82±1.49)d,住院时间为(25.1±1.1) d;明显短于对照组患者,两组上述指标对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的医嘱依从率和护理满意率分别为98.46%和100%, 均明显高于对照组(74.62%、79.23%),两组患者的医嘱依从率和护理满意率对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05). 结论 对于小儿肺炎患者,采用早期系统性的护理干预措施,对小儿肺炎的康复疗效明显,值得临床推广.
目的 探討和分析早期護理榦預對于小兒肺炎的臨床護理效果. 方法 整群選取2013年3月—2014年2月間,該院醫治的130例小兒肺炎患者為對照組;2014年3月—2015年2月間, 該院醫治的130例小兒肺炎患者為觀察組. 在臨床中,對于對照組隻進行傳統護理;對觀察組則在早期進行繫統護理,且有針對性的護理榦預,對二者的療效進行比較. 結果觀察組患兒的咳嗽、髮熱、肺部啰音的癥狀改善時間分彆為(5.51±1.41)、(4.82±1.19)和(6.82±1.49)d,住院時間為(25.1±1.1) d;明顯短于對照組患者,兩組上述指標對比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05);觀察組患者的醫囑依從率和護理滿意率分彆為98.46%和100%, 均明顯高于對照組(74.62%、79.23%),兩組患者的醫囑依從率和護理滿意率對比,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05). 結論 對于小兒肺炎患者,採用早期繫統性的護理榦預措施,對小兒肺炎的康複療效明顯,值得臨床推廣.
목적 탐토화분석조기호리간예대우소인폐염적림상호리효과. 방법 정군선취2013년3월—2014년2월간,해원의치적130례소인폐염환자위대조조;2014년3월—2015년2월간, 해원의치적130례소인폐염환자위관찰조. 재림상중,대우대조조지진행전통호리;대관찰조칙재조기진행계통호리,차유침대성적호리간예,대이자적료효진행비교. 결과관찰조환인적해수、발열、폐부라음적증상개선시간분별위(5.51±1.41)、(4.82±1.19)화(6.82±1.49)d,주원시간위(25.1±1.1) d;명현단우대조조환자,량조상술지표대비,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05);관찰조환자적의촉의종솔화호리만의솔분별위98.46%화100%, 균명현고우대조조(74.62%、79.23%),량조환자적의촉의종솔화호리만의솔대비,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05). 결론 대우소인폐염환자,채용조기계통성적호리간예조시,대소인폐염적강복료효명현,치득림상추엄.
Objective To explore and analyze the clinical effect of early nursing intervention on infantile pneumonia. Methods 130 children with pneumonia treated in our hospital from March 2013 to February 2014 were selected as the control group, and other 130 children with pneumonia treated in our hospital from March 2014 to February 2015 were selected as the observation group. Children in the control group were treated by traditional nursing, and those in the observation group were treated by early targeted and systematic nursing intervention. And the efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results In the observation group, the time for improving cough, fever and pulmonary rales was (5.51±1.41)d, (4.82±1.19)d and (6.82±1.49)d, respectively, the length of stay was (25.1±1.1)d, which was much shorter than that in the control group, respectively with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had obviously higher treatment compliance rate (98.46% vs 74.62%), significantly higher level of nursing satisfaction(100% vs 79.23%) with statistically significant difference(P<0.05). Con-clusion Early systematic nursing intervention has significant effect on the rehabilitation in children with pneumonia, so it is worthy of clinical promotion.
