中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
28期
167-169
,共3页
急性肾盂肾炎%临床护理%心理护理
急性腎盂腎炎%臨床護理%心理護理
급성신우신염%림상호리%심리호리
Acute pyelonephritis%Clinical care%Psychological care
目的 探讨心理护理在急性肾盂肾炎患者中的应用效果. 方法 整群选取2013年1月—2015年1月该院收治的急性肾盂肾炎患者96例,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组48例. 两组均实施常规综合药物治疗,对照组实施常规护理,观察组在对照组的加强心理护理,对比两组的临床疗效与护理效果. 结果 观察组的治愈率及总有效率分别为70.83%、95.83%,高于对照组的60.42%、89.58%,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的住院时间为(15.32±6.24)d,相比于对照组的(21.43± 8.32)d显著缩短(P<0.05);护理后两组的SDS及SAS评分均显著降低,且观察组显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组的护理满意度为93.75%,显著高于对照组的81.25%(P<0.05). 结论 在急性肾盂肾炎的临床治疗护理中介入心理护理,能够促进患者的病情康复,改善患者的心理状态及临床预后,值得推广应用.
目的 探討心理護理在急性腎盂腎炎患者中的應用效果. 方法 整群選取2013年1月—2015年1月該院收治的急性腎盂腎炎患者96例,隨機分為觀察組與對照組,每組48例. 兩組均實施常規綜閤藥物治療,對照組實施常規護理,觀察組在對照組的加彊心理護理,對比兩組的臨床療效與護理效果. 結果 觀察組的治愈率及總有效率分彆為70.83%、95.83%,高于對照組的60.42%、89.58%,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);觀察組的住院時間為(15.32±6.24)d,相比于對照組的(21.43± 8.32)d顯著縮短(P<0.05);護理後兩組的SDS及SAS評分均顯著降低,且觀察組顯著低于對照組(P<0.05);觀察組的護理滿意度為93.75%,顯著高于對照組的81.25%(P<0.05). 結論 在急性腎盂腎炎的臨床治療護理中介入心理護理,能夠促進患者的病情康複,改善患者的心理狀態及臨床預後,值得推廣應用.
목적 탐토심리호리재급성신우신염환자중적응용효과. 방법 정군선취2013년1월—2015년1월해원수치적급성신우신염환자96례,수궤분위관찰조여대조조,매조48례. 량조균실시상규종합약물치료,대조조실시상규호리,관찰조재대조조적가강심리호리,대비량조적림상료효여호리효과. 결과 관찰조적치유솔급총유효솔분별위70.83%、95.83%,고우대조조적60.42%、89.58%,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);관찰조적주원시간위(15.32±6.24)d,상비우대조조적(21.43± 8.32)d현저축단(P<0.05);호리후량조적SDS급SAS평분균현저강저,차관찰조현저저우대조조(P<0.05);관찰조적호리만의도위93.75%,현저고우대조조적81.25%(P<0.05). 결론 재급성신우신염적림상치료호리중개입심리호리,능구촉진환자적병정강복,개선환자적심리상태급림상예후,치득추엄응용.
Objective To investigate the effects of psychological nursing on patients with acute pyelonephritis. Methods 96 pa-tients with acute pyelonephritis admitted in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015 were randomly divided into observa-tion group and control group, 48 cases in each group. Both groups were treated by the conventional and comprehensive medication. The control group received usual care, the observation group received psychological care on the basis of usual care. And the clini-cal effect and nursing efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results The cure rate was higher in the observation group than that in the control group (70.83%vs 60.42%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05);the overall response rate was higher in the observation group than that in the control group (95.83% vs 89.58%), but the difference was not statistically sig-nificant (P>0.05). The length of stay was much shorter in the observation group than that in the control group [(15.32 ±6.24)d vs (21.43±8.32)d], (P<0.05). After nursing, the SDS and SAS scores decreased significantly in both groups compared with those before nursing, moreover, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were much lower than those of the control group(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously higher nursing satisfaction (93.75%vs 81.25%) (P<0.05). Conclusion Psychological care applied to the clinical treatment and nursing for acute pyelonephritis, can promote the rehabilitation and improve the mental state and clinical outcomes of the patients, so it is worthy of application and promotion.