中国社区医师
中國社區醫師
중국사구의사
Chinese Community Doctors
2015年
32期
106-106,109
,共2页
老年人%心肌梗死%心脏超声
老年人%心肌梗死%心髒超聲
노년인%심기경사%심장초성
Elderly%Myocardial infarction%Cardiac ultrasound
目的：分析老年急性心肌梗死患者心脏超声特征。方法：收治老年急性心肌梗死患者152例，其中60～70岁46例，71～80岁62例，＞80岁44例。对所有患者给予心脏多普勒超声检查，比较各组患者的左心房室内径、LVEF、E/A、左心室肥厚程度。结果：3个年龄段患者除E/A这个指标外，LVEF、左心房内径、左心室内径比较，差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)，年龄越大指标越差。年龄＞80岁的患者后下壁心肌梗死比例明显高于其他2个年龄段(P＜0.05)。年龄越大预后越差。结论：老年心肌梗死患者年龄越大，心脏超声表现越差，预后越差。
目的：分析老年急性心肌梗死患者心髒超聲特徵。方法：收治老年急性心肌梗死患者152例，其中60～70歲46例，71～80歲62例，＞80歲44例。對所有患者給予心髒多普勒超聲檢查，比較各組患者的左心房室內徑、LVEF、E/A、左心室肥厚程度。結果：3箇年齡段患者除E/A這箇指標外，LVEF、左心房內徑、左心室內徑比較，差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.05)，年齡越大指標越差。年齡＞80歲的患者後下壁心肌梗死比例明顯高于其他2箇年齡段(P＜0.05)。年齡越大預後越差。結論：老年心肌梗死患者年齡越大，心髒超聲錶現越差，預後越差。
목적：분석노년급성심기경사환자심장초성특정。방법：수치노년급성심기경사환자152례，기중60～70세46례，71～80세62례，＞80세44례。대소유환자급여심장다보륵초성검사，비교각조환자적좌심방실내경、LVEF、E/A、좌심실비후정도。결과：3개년령단환자제E/A저개지표외，LVEF、좌심방내경、좌심실내경비교，차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.05)，년령월대지표월차。년령＞80세적환자후하벽심기경사비례명현고우기타2개년령단(P＜0.05)。년령월대예후월차。결론：노년심기경사환자년령월대，심장초성표현월차，예후월차。
Objective:To analyze the cardiac ultrasound characteristics of elderly patients with acute myocardial.Methods:152 elderly patients with acute myocardial were selected.Among them,46 cases were 60 to 70 years old,62 cases were 71 to 80 years old,44 cases were more than 80 years old.All patients were given cardiac doppler echocardiography examination.The left ventricular diameter,LVEF,E/A and left ventricular hypertrophy degree of each group were compared.Results:In addition to the E/A this index,the LVEF,left atrial diameter and left ventricular diameter of patients in three age groups were compared,the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05),the age was greater and the index was worse.The postero-inferior myocardial infarction proportion of patients more than 80 years old was significantly higher than those of the other two age groups(P<0.05). The age was greater and the prognosis was worse.Conclusion:The age of elderly patients with myocardial infarction is greater,the cardiac ultrasound manifestation is worse,the prognosis is worse.
