图书情报导刊
圖書情報導刊
도서정보도간
Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy
2015年
21期
122-125
,共4页
期刊论文%被引量峰值%对比研究
期刊論文%被引量峰值%對比研究
기간논문%피인량봉치%대비연구
journals papers%peak of cited number%comparative study
目的:比较国内外相同学科期刊论文的被引峰值年代差异。方法:选择国内外自然科学(数学、眼科学)和社会科学(图书情报学、管理学)各学科的5种期刊,分别统计这20种期刊2004年发表的论文在2004—2013年各年度的被引量并进行对比观察国内外相同学科期刊被引峰值年代差异。结果:国内数学期刊论文被引高峰年代为3~6年,早于国内前几年研究,但晚于国外同时间点的数学期刊2~4年;而国内5种眼科学核心期刊论文被引高峰均为发表后第3年,国外为3~4年,差异不大。国内图书馆情报学期刊论文发表后2~3年就达到被引高峰,国外为3~5年;国内管理学期刊论文发表后3~6年达到被引高峰,国外管理学期刊论文为发表后7~8年。结论:不同学科期刊论文的被引高峰都是不同的,比较相同学科国内外期刊论文被引高峰差异,可以了解该学科我国研究人员吸收借鉴新颖文献能力与国外的差异。
目的:比較國內外相同學科期刊論文的被引峰值年代差異。方法:選擇國內外自然科學(數學、眼科學)和社會科學(圖書情報學、管理學)各學科的5種期刊,分彆統計這20種期刊2004年髮錶的論文在2004—2013年各年度的被引量併進行對比觀察國內外相同學科期刊被引峰值年代差異。結果:國內數學期刊論文被引高峰年代為3~6年,早于國內前幾年研究,但晚于國外同時間點的數學期刊2~4年;而國內5種眼科學覈心期刊論文被引高峰均為髮錶後第3年,國外為3~4年,差異不大。國內圖書館情報學期刊論文髮錶後2~3年就達到被引高峰,國外為3~5年;國內管理學期刊論文髮錶後3~6年達到被引高峰,國外管理學期刊論文為髮錶後7~8年。結論:不同學科期刊論文的被引高峰都是不同的,比較相同學科國內外期刊論文被引高峰差異,可以瞭解該學科我國研究人員吸收藉鑒新穎文獻能力與國外的差異。
목적:비교국내외상동학과기간논문적피인봉치년대차이。방법:선택국내외자연과학(수학、안과학)화사회과학(도서정보학、관이학)각학과적5충기간,분별통계저20충기간2004년발표적논문재2004—2013년각년도적피인량병진행대비관찰국내외상동학과기간피인봉치년대차이。결과:국내수학기간논문피인고봉년대위3~6년,조우국내전궤년연구,단만우국외동시간점적수학기간2~4년;이국내5충안과학핵심기간논문피인고봉균위발표후제3년,국외위3~4년,차이불대。국내도서관정보학기간논문발표후2~3년취체도피인고봉,국외위3~5년;국내관이학기간논문발표후3~6년체도피인고봉,국외관이학기간논문위발표후7~8년。결론:불동학과기간논문적피인고봉도시불동적,비교상동학과국내외기간논문피인고봉차이,가이료해해학과아국연구인원흡수차감신영문헌능력여국외적차이。
Objective:To compare the difference of the citation peak years of the papers published in domestic and foreign journals with the same subject. Methods:To select 5 kinds of domestic and foreign journals in each subject of the natural science (mathematics and ophthalmology)and the social sciences (library information science and management science) for making a statistical analysis on each year’s cited numbers in the period of 2004-2013 of the papers published in the 20 kinds of journals respectively in 2004 and a comparative observation of the the difference of the citation peak years of domestic and foreign journals with the same subject. Results:The citation peak years of the papers published in domestic mathematical journals are 3 to 6 years,earlier than that of domestic study a few years ago,but 2 to 4 years later than foreign mathematical journals published at the same time points;the citation peak year of the papers published in 5 kinds of domestic core journals of ophthalmology is the 3rd year after being published, and for the foreign journals of ophthalmology, it is after 3 to 4 years of being published, the difference is not big. The papers published in domestic journals of the library information sciences can achieve the citation peak after 2 to 3 years of being published, and for the foreign journals of the library information sciences, it is after 3 to 5 years of being published; the papers published in domestic journals of the management sciences can achieve the citation peak after 3 to 6 years of being published, and for the foreign journals of the management sciences, it is after 7 to 8 years of being published. Conclusion:The citation peak of the journal papers of different subjects is different,through the comparison the difference of citation peak of the papers published in domestic journals and foreign journals with the same subject, we can understand the difference the novel literature absorbing ability of domestic researchers with foreign researcher.