中外医疗
中外醫療
중외의료
China Foreign Medical Treatment
2015年
31期
82-83
,共2页
儿童%细菌性痢疾%临床疗效
兒童%細菌性痢疾%臨床療效
인동%세균성이질%림상료효
Children%Bacillary dysentery%Clinical efficacy
目的:探讨治疗儿童细菌性痢疾的治疗方法,用于指导临床应用。方法整群选取2013年12月-2014年12月该院收治的细菌性痢疾患儿76例,随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组38例,将观察组用先锋必治疗法治疗,对照组采用常规方法治疗,然后进行疗效比较观察。结果治疗组的显效例数为19例,显效率为50.00%,有效例数是14例,有效率为36.84%,总有效率为86.84%。而对照组中显效例数为14例,显效率为36.84%,有效例数为12例,有效率为31.58%,总有效率68.42%。治疗组的总有效率明显高于对照组,说明观察组治疗方法明显优于对照组,统计学处理后差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用先锋必治疗法治疗儿童细菌性痢疾效果显著,值得临床推广。
目的:探討治療兒童細菌性痢疾的治療方法,用于指導臨床應用。方法整群選取2013年12月-2014年12月該院收治的細菌性痢疾患兒76例,隨機分為治療組和對照組,每組38例,將觀察組用先鋒必治療法治療,對照組採用常規方法治療,然後進行療效比較觀察。結果治療組的顯效例數為19例,顯效率為50.00%,有效例數是14例,有效率為36.84%,總有效率為86.84%。而對照組中顯效例數為14例,顯效率為36.84%,有效例數為12例,有效率為31.58%,總有效率68.42%。治療組的總有效率明顯高于對照組,說明觀察組治療方法明顯優于對照組,統計學處理後差異有統計學意義(P<0.05)。結論應用先鋒必治療法治療兒童細菌性痢疾效果顯著,值得臨床推廣。
목적:탐토치료인동세균성이질적치료방법,용우지도림상응용。방법정군선취2013년12월-2014년12월해원수치적세균성이질환인76례,수궤분위치료조화대조조,매조38례,장관찰조용선봉필치요법치료,대조조채용상규방법치료,연후진행료효비교관찰。결과치료조적현효례수위19례,현효솔위50.00%,유효례수시14례,유효솔위36.84%,총유효솔위86.84%。이대조조중현효례수위14례,현효솔위36.84%,유효례수위12례,유효솔위31.58%,총유효솔68.42%。치료조적총유효솔명현고우대조조,설명관찰조치료방법명현우우대조조,통계학처리후차이유통계학의의(P<0.05)。결론응용선봉필치요법치료인동세균성이질효과현저,치득림상추엄。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic methods for children with bacillary treatment so as to provide guidance for their clinical application. Methods 76 children with bacillary treatment admitted to our hospital from December 2013 and December 2014 were randomly divided into treatment group and control group with 38 in each one. The treatment group was treated with cefoperazone, while the control group underwent conventional treatment. The clinical outcomes were observed and compared between the groups. Results In the treatment group, 19 (50.00%) patients obtained obvious effect and 14 (36.84%) obtained effect with a total effective rate of 86.84%, while in the control group, 14 (36.84%) patients ob-tained obvious effect and 12 (31.58%) obtained effect with a total effective rate of 68.42%. The total effective rate was sig-nificantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group, which indicated that the therapeutic method adopted in the treatment group was superior to that used in the control group with statistically significant, P<0.05. Conclusion Cefoper-azone is worthy of promotion in the clinical treatment of children with bacillary treatment due to its remarkable effect.